2nd Ebola Victim Infected: Ebola is Probably an Act of Deliberate Sabotage

http://news.yahoo.com/texas-nurse-contracted-ebola-understood-risks-153314500.html

http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-diagnosed-in-second-dallas-nurse-105542930.html

A second person has come down with Ebola in Texas. This is too much now to be a coincidence. How does someone wearing hazmat gear get infected? They have no skin exposed. People are saying that they must have not followed the proper safety procedures, or that maybe the nurse took her gloves off and rubbed her eye, or that they interacted with the patient before putting on the proper gear. But there is ZERO evidence for any of those theories, other than the fact that they got infected, which is circumstantial evidence at best.

It’s a fact that they got infected, it is not a fact that they breached protocol. The fact that they are infected can only be used to validate a breach of protocol if all other possibilities can be eliminated. Is there any reason to rule out deliberate infection? Not at all.

Actually, when I first heard about the nurse (Nina Pham) becoming infected I surmised that deliberate infection was a strong possibility. It reminded me of an old story I heard about an attempt to deliberately infect Native Americans with smallpox. Lord Jeffry Amhurst, commander of the English forces in North America during the “French and Indian War” suggested giving Native Americans blankets infected with smallpox. We don’t know if they actually did it or not, but it was on their list of things to do.

How can anyone do such a thing? It’s easy when someone has a broken moral compass and an agenda they want to get through. It’s worth noting that the English had the idea of the “noble savage” when dealing with Native Americans. Not all of them felt that way, but that idea was there among them, and yet the commander of the English forces came up with such a scheme all the same.

Coming back to our time, it wouldn’t be hard for a government agent working at the hospital to contaminate some of the hazmat suits, maybe putting a drop of sweat or blood from the infected patient in one of the gloves or goggles, especially if that agent was the person responsible for distributing or cleaning the gear in the first place.

Now why would the government do that? A better question is, why not? Has there ever been a more anti-American and un-Constitutional government than we have now? Why is it that people think the government can do no wrong, or no evil? Of course they can, and they do. Contrary to the popular belief among Koolaid drinkers, Obama is not Jesus. He doesn’t love you.

Actually our current government holds us in lower regard than the English did the Native Americans. They don’t even view us as “noble savages,” but as potential “domestic terrorists.” They don’t even acknowledge that we are hard working and pay most of the taxes which they continually suck up and squander. The closest they come to it is through statements about how we have to pay “our fair share” of the tax burden.

Here are some of the reasons why I believe they would deliberately contaminate people.

  1. Rahm Emanuel said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.” The Democrats pretty much lives by that statement, jumping on disasters and using them as impetus to push their agenda, which is always more statism and less freedom. We had zero presence of Ebola in the US prior to 2014. Oblamo and his ilk started setting up Ebola protocols before there was any presence of Ebola here, then they started flying people with Ebola into the country. As if that were not bad enough, he then deployed our military over there where they would be exposed to the disease. They literally deliberately brought Ebola to this country. Yes I know, ostensibly they brought them here for treatment, but that doesn’t change the fact that they brought Ebola here on purpose, and treating those people doesn’t justify exposing the country to a deadly contaigen.
  2. Leftists like equality of outcome. They don’t care how much hard work someone put into building a society or a business, they want everyone to be equal (except for the ruling political/elite class) in poverty and misery. They want equality between countries as well, which is why Obummer will funnel billions of tax payer dollars to the 3rd world but won’t authorize the Keystone Pipeline, and why the Democrats are against domestic drilling but OK with buying from the likes of Hugo Chavez.
  3. The Democrats (and the left in general), hate patriotic Americans and have nothing but dripping disdain for anything having to do with traditional America. This is evidenced by a whole slew of comments, from Obozo’s comment about “guns and religion” to Lois Lerner’s emails calling conservatives assholes. Conservatives are assholes? For what? Wanting to keep their own money that they earned through working? That’s like a tic calling a dog an asshole because he doesn’t want to have his blood sucked. It’s his blood, of course he doesn’t want to have it sucked. But I digress, this is the attitude we are faced with, a government that hates us.
  4. We have a government which has admitted that they want to lower our standard of living. John Holdren, Oblamo’s White House Director of Science and Technology said very clearly that he wants to “de develop” America. “A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States,” Holdren said in his book “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.” Of course, it is worth mentioning that he also wants to reduce the population of the US: http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/john-holdren-words-de-develop-u-s-reduce-population/ An out of control plague is a good way to do that. A rampant out of control 3rd world disease is also a good way to create third world conditions in a first world country. Imagine, not being able to drink water in public, not knowing where it is safe to sit down, not being able to eat out for fear of contamination… An unrestrained outbreak would have disastrous conse
  5. Of all the places for a third world breakout to start, from the perspective of the Democrats Texas would be an ideal location. Texas is a conservative bastion, potentially the most conservative state in the country, and there are talks of secession there. Choosing Texas as ground zero for an infection would both punish them and potentially keep them from seceding, as talk about secession might be put on the shelf as immediate survival takes precedence. It may also make them more dependant on the Federal Government for aid in crisis relief, and it would kill a lot of anti-government people. Similarly Texas is already a prime target for the flood of illegal immigration, which I believe is another attack vector our government is using to undermine them.

We may never know the truth of this, but my suspicions are on the government, and for good reasons.

Advertisements

Published by:

Radamanthes

I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories Uncategorized2 Comments

2 thoughts on “2nd Ebola Victim Infected: Ebola is Probably an Act of Deliberate Sabotage”

  1. Google the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. It’s no paranoid delusion that the government may infect people with a potentially fatal contagion when they already have… recently. This whole thing is so upsetting to me I can’t even put words to it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hey, welcome to the Word Press. Yes, it’s quite enraging for me as well. I’ve been struggling a lot lately with keeping my aggrevation under control. Anyone who votes Democrat after this needs to have their brain checked, and probably shouldn’t breed either. The fact that he sends out military to be exposed to this horrible flesh eating disease is unforgivable treason, same goes for bringing it here. I heard that people in those countries got Ebola from eating bats, which is the known vector for Ebola. That’s their own fault for making a stupid choice. It’s got nothing to do with us in the US. This is a case of punishing us for the stupidity of others. This man will shelter his daughters so much, but then he will send other people’s sons and daughters to ebola land to get infected, and to bring it back here. I’m wondering how he would feel if some other pompous dictator sent his daughters to Libera to work with ebola patients. Would he allow it? No. If they got sick with it what would he do? I’m wondering whether he hates America more or white people more. Given how he’s such a leftist and anti-colonialist it probably bothers him that not many white people are dying of ebola, so in his mind he probably thinks those numbers need to be evened out for the sake of “fairness.”

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s