Women Should Not Shave Their Heads

By now it should be evident that Miley Cyrus is trying to push back the envelope on what is considered taboo or unacceptable when it comes to PDA, or I guess PDS (Public Displays of Sexuality).  I also believe she’s trying to shock people, of course, in a grossly oversexed culture this is an increasingly difficult task. It is clear that Miley Cyrus likes to flaunt sexual things, but the real question is who likes Miley Cyrus?  She places emphasis on sexual things, and how she likes to go through the motions, but does that make her sexy?  It does make her a disgusting slime crawling pervert, but sexy?

I’m a married man, but that doesn’t mean the radar stops working when it comes to women.  Married men still notice an attractive woman, even if he are not actively interested.  The male awareness of beauty and attractive women can be described as a blip on the radar, or sonar.  Imagine some WWII movie, with the circular screen, and the line going around from the center of the circle that goes PING every time a blip appears. That’s how it works.  Well, Miley Cyrus isn’t even a blip on the radar.

When I see her it causes a sensation which is the opposite of attraction, which I would describe as revulsion and discomfort.  I have determined that the main cause of this was her mostly shaven head, and what makes it more irritating is that she is trying to convince us that the shaved head is attractive, or that we should be attracted to it.  This is a typical aspect of leftist behavior.  Rather than embracing things that are natural, the left wants to rebel against the natural and redefine reality.  Of course it is not possible to redefine reality, but the leftist mind does not live in reality it lives in a made up fantasy land where right is wrong and wrong is right, but they want everyone else to act as though their fantasies are reality.   In other words, they want to tell you what to think, but I digress.

The fact is I don’t know any men who like women with shaved heads, or find it attractive.  For me, Miley’s shaved head totally desexualizes her.  A full head of hair is a natural indicator of health and vitality, and long hair accentuates a woman’s femininity.  Femininity and health are two of the primary resources men are interested in when it comes to women.  It’s instinctual.  The stronger a woman projects femininity and vitality the more appeal she will have to men (conversely the more a woman projects deviance the less attractive she is).  Even a woman with a mediocre face, like Miley, can be highly attractive if she projects a strong sense of femininity and health, but without that, forget about it.

What disturbs me more than Miley, however, is what seems to be the growing number of copy cats.  First of all, copycatting someone else shows a lack of ingenuity and a weak sense of personal identity.  Second, if you’re going to copy something then it’s not a good idea to copy something which is overtly ugly.  Whoever said that a shaved headed woman was attractive to men?  I know there are some men who have fetishes for that (none that I know personally), but those are the deviants, not the norm, and no traditional man will ever like that kind of rubbish hairstyle.  If I had to venture a guess, the amount of men who like that is probably about the same percentage as those who are gay, maybe less.  So because some men like men does that mean if you’re a woman you should go out and get surgery to look like a man?  I hope not.

The shaved head is not attractive, mohawks are not attractive, and buzzcuts are not attractive.  Shaving any part of a woman’s head invokes images of disease and POW camps, not vitality, health, or femininity.  If you are a woman and thinking about shaving any part of your head, do not do it.  It’s ugly.  It doesn’t matter if Mily Cyrus or Rihanna did it.  You are not Miley Cyrus or Rihanna.  You have no celebrity aspect to even partially compensate for having a diseased looking haircut.

Rather than listening to the media and celebrities, you need to listen to what men want.  I saw an article talking about buzz cuts and pixie cuts, claiming that they are “hot,” inspiring fads, sexy, etc., but men do not like those hairstyles.  I don’t recommend short hair either.  Some women can still look good with short hair, but they aren’t looking good because of it, they’re looking good in SPITE of it, and when they have long hair they always look better.  Don’t listen to the stupid magazines, celebrity gossip, and whatever rubbish celebrities are doing.  Ask men what they like, because at the end of the day men are your target demographic.

It doesn’t matter what gay men, celebrities, and fashion moguls are telling you.  They aren’t your target audience.  None of those people bother to ask men what they like.  They would rather tell us what to like, and they want to suck you in so that you’ll spend money on their rubbish products.  You need to come out of that culture.

Whenever I have this discussion with women in public forums I always catch flak for this FROM women.  “Some women look good with..,” “I’m a hairstylist and..,” “My friend said..,” “You’re trying to force..,” “You’re sexist..,” “That’s only your opinion..,” “This is 20__,”  “I have this friend and..,”  STOP.  Just back the truck up and stop it.  Are you trying to market yourself to regular/real men, or gay men who work in fashion?

If you’re goal is to appeal to the smaller/more irrelevant demographic then don’t listen to me.  If you want a regular or average man then you had better listen to what we are saying.  If you want a wealthy man, which a lot of women do, then you had really better listen.  Don’t expect to change men’s minds or nature with your shaved head, tattoos, tattered jeans, and whatever other stupid celebrity quirk you are trying to mimic.

I suspect that they are trying to do with the shaved head what they did with short hair in the 1920’s.  In the 20’s they successfully introduced short hair on women.  They never asked men if they liked it, they just did it, largely out of rebellion or to be edgy, but it was promoted by the celebrities of the day.  Women did it on their own, and men were forced to deal with it due to the lack of options (Even so, those women were not shaving or buzz cutting.).  Men allow a lot of things for the sake of peace when it comes to relationships.  This is how it works, a woman may want to have X and Y, and if she doesn’t get them then she’s going to pitch a fit and the man knows it.  For the sake of peace, the man may evaluate X and Y, and determine which of those he can bear more easily, so at the end of the day he allows her to engage in X as a compromise, and Y gets dropped.  There is still some fit pitched over not having Y, but the level of retribution he receives is not nearly as bad as it would be if both X and Y were denied, and at least he does not have to put up with Y (which is a partial victory as he has deemed that Y was worse).

After one or two generations, the shorter hair on women would be considered normal, as the boys would have grown up not knowing anything else.  However, some would still fantasize about other things, which is why it is worthwhile to look at the art from pulp fiction sci-fi magazines, which were designed to target the more imaginative and younger men of the 1940’s and 1950’s (Planet Stories, Startling Stories, Wonder Stories).


But what happened with short hair in the 1920’s, will not happen with shorter hair and shaved hair now, at least, not in any western countries.  I will explain why:

First of all, when short hair (for women) appeared in the 1920’s it was novel, so basically it had the virtue of never having been tried.  Furthermore, that program of short hair ran for about 40 years, so it is entirely played out.  Second, during the 1920’s through the 1950’s western countries were largely homogenous.  Meaning, they had large majorities of a monolithic culture which people identified strongly with.  There were very few minorities, and such minorities as they had were more interested in assimilating with the dominant group than opposing it.  People had a stronger sense of community, culture, and national identity.  Only one specific demographic had to be targeted to sell anything at all.

Now when it comes to introducing radical new fashions and trends today, the process is far more difficult, even with the greater speed at which information can be exchanged.  Why?  Because now many different sub-cultures have to be targeted, it takes more than one vector to cause a trend.

The majority of immigrants we have coming now do not assimilate, and cling to their original culture, for better or worse.  In the case of the bulk of third world immigration it is for the worse, but the fact is their culture is stronger than whatever fluff the liberals are trying to push.  The 3rd worlders will take advantage of what the liberals are pushing when they have a use for it(welfare and citizenship), but they won’t conform and assimilate to white liberal culture any more than they will assimilate to traditional western culture.  The more sophisticated and productive immigrants will recognize the gender bending and overly sexualized liberal culture for the rubbish that it is and disregard it.

When it comes to white people, there is a significant difference between generations (due to an increasingly large difference in upbringing over a relatively short amount of time), but also a difference between conservative and liberal, or right wing vs. left.  What remains of traditional white America, has become increasingly jaded toward celebrities, media, and government, and we have grown increasingly unamenable to being told what to think or like.  Most of the goofy celebrity trends are designed to target young white liberals, which is a shrinking demographic (in terms of proportion) due to low birthrates and high levels of immigration.

So let me recap and break it down:

If you are a woman, do not shave any part of your head.   No you can’t force men to like what you like just because you want it.  No that doesn’t make men misogynist or evil just because they don’t like something hideous.  In fact if you try to force the issue then the forcefulness of your personality will be an additional strike against you.

It’s better if you don’t cut your hair short.  The “pixie” cut is not attractive.  It doesn’t matter if you name the haircut (incorrectly) after a mystical fairy creature.  That doesn’t make it beautiful or feminize it.  It’s still a man’s haircut.  Slapping a cute label on an ugly thing doesn’t make the ugly thing less ugly.

How short is too short?  That varies depending on the guy, but if a buzzer or razor is being used on any part of your head then your hair is probably too short.  That’s a good place to start.  Better to have longer hair, because you can appeal to a larger demographic of more traditional men, and contrary to the feminist dogma traditional men will take better care of a woman and also have more respect for women.

Yes, you can do whatever you want, but it’s going to lower your appeal.  If you want to have a shaved head and tattoos, or whatever, then your boyfriend is probably going to be a girlfriend.  Either that, or you will end up with some emaciated emotional guy who wears skinny jeans and has his eyes covered with bangs (maybe even wears lipstick).  I know that there will be some woman who reads this and says “I look like that and my boyfriend looks like a sissy/queer!”  As if one dubious exception disproves a generalization.

Also, you must bear in mind that men have more options now for marrying different races, cultures, and from different parts of the world.  Back in the 40’s men had to choose from women in their local area, but now a man can get on the internet and strike up a relationship with a woman in China if he wants, completely circumventing the women in his local area.  As the culture in the local area becomes more hostile and tepid, more men will choose the internet as their first option rather than their last ditch effort, and lots of women will be left out to dry.

In general, if you want to attract a man, you need to present yourself as a real woman.  Don’t expect the culture to adjust to your weirdness, because the culture is becoming increasingly fragmented, which means that abstract fashions are far less likely than ever before to become trends.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories Uncategorized2 Comments

2 thoughts on “Women Should Not Shave Their Heads”

  1. I find long hair on men completely hideous, regardless of any other attractive qualities he may have. I have seen men who look like Greek gods from the front, but as soon as a ponytail peeks out I am repulsed. So I can empathize with how men feel about short hair. Interestingly, I don’t think I’m in the minority as a female either. Yet I’ve never met a guy who was offended by that preference of mine. So why can’t as many females stop feeling personally attacked by everything and just try to relate a little?

    Also, I would bet a lot of money that Miley Cyrus is on some serious drugs. She has always been a really annoying person (she’s obnoxiously extroverted), but the girl has fallen off her rocker. She’s turned into a complete wacko.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. My wife also hates it. If I go too long without getting a haircut she fusses at me. Guys usually won’t be offended because they don’t care as much about what other people think, or their self esteem isn’t tied to it so much. Usually when you have a difference of opinion like that they just take it as that and don’t let it ruin their lives. I think a lot of women want acceptance, but then some of them also want to do something “edgy” or push the bar, and yet, they are still often ill prepared to face disapproval. Maybe it’s because they want to appeal to a new crowd without alienating the old crowd (a classic case of wanting to have the cake and eat it too), but I don’t know for sure, I’m just guessing.

      Probably so. She’s both a whore and an attention whore.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s