Immigration Laws ARE Just

I just read this article, and I had to say something.  The article is titled “Look at This Photo And Tell Me Immigration Laws Are Just,” and the author is Dylan Matthews.  The photo he shows is of a small Spanish enclave in Morocco, and Moroccans, or possibly black Africans, trying to climb the wall to get into Spain.

He proceeds to argue that we should allow 3rd world immigrants to stay, legal or otherwise, because it helps them to be in our countries:

If they make it over, and are allowed to stay, the migrants will do not just a little better, but much, much better. Maybe not seven times better, but that number is not far off. It’s pretty firmly established that workers in developed countries make much more than workers in developing countries doing identical labor.

And he continues to say:

So why don’t we let people stay? It’s kind of unclear. The case that immigration hurts rich countries like the US or Spain economically is so weak that even opponents tend not to make it. The case that it hurts low-skilled workers is heavily disputed and, in any case, addressable through transfer programs within rich countries. The economic case against immigration only makes sense if you’re willing to put negative weight on the well-being of foreigners.

Not only does he fail to address the arguments, but he also fails to understand them and the basis behind them.  He is also unaware of the arguments, and he engages in red-herring with the asinine remark of putting “negative weight on the well-being of foreigners.”  The well-being of foreigners is not part of the argument, one way or another.

The reason why we have borders and countries is because humanity consists of many sub-groups.  Borders exist to so that different people groups can engage in self-rule and determine their own destiny.  If one people group rules over another, than the people group being ruled over does not have self-rule, and thus have no control over their destiny.  They are at the mercy of their overlords.  This is a very simple concept which anyone with an IQ above 70 should be able to grasp.  Our sovereignty is undermined by a constant unabated influx of foreigners.

If group X immigrates into the territory of group Y, and group X eventually becomes the majority, then group Y will inevitably lose control of their own territory.  There will now be two territories which belong to group X, and group Y will be dispossessed.  Every group has a vested interest in maintaining themselves as a majority in their territory, so that they can continue with their culture, lifestyle, standard of living, etc.

But coming back to Dylan, only a complete fool would think that adding a large influx of unskilled foreign workers is not going to hurt domestic workers.  If Wallmart only has ten openings, and there are 20 people applying then adding 100 more applicants is going to decrease everyone in that pool’s chance of getting one of those ten openings.  Why will an employer suddenly have more money to hire more people just because more people show up overnight?  The fact is he won’t, but unwanted competition for limited jobs is only part of the problem.

The bigger problem is the ghettoization of the 1st world.  Flooding the 1st world with 3rd worlders is not going to uplift the 3rd world, nor will it in any way uplift the 1st world.  In the short term it may help some a few unscrupulous businessmen get a little fatter by hiring illegals who they don’t have to pay minimum wage to, but this is undermined as soon as the 3rd worlders are granted any sort of legal status, whether it be work permits or citizenship, and the problem remains.

Stepping into a 1st world country does not magically turn a 3rd worlder into a 1st worlder.  If that were the case then there would be no difference in crime rates based on race and ethnicity.  There would also be no difference in birth rates, academic performance, income, or welfare usage.

Let’s be real, the entire first world was created by whites, Asians, and Jews.  Not everyone wants to face this reality, but no one can name a 1st world country which was not founded by one of those groups. Whether this is because we have superior values, or because we have a genetic predisposition to higher intelligence is hard to say.  The matter has yet to be thoroughly studied scientifically, but the fact is that our birthrates are lower than those of 3rd world people, and we already know what sort of systems and countries the 3rd worlders build.  All we have to do is look at any country where 3rd worlders are the majority to see what will become of our countries should they ever become the majority.  We cannot allow them to flood in and stay, or we will lose everything from self-rule to the relatively peaceful and secure lifestyles we enjoy.

What benefits 3rd worlders draw from being in our countries are thoroughly irrelevant.  We have nothing to gain from 3rd world cultures and conditions being duplicated in our own neighborhoods.  We can do without the gangs, the violence, the honor killings, and the diseases.   I don’t want Muslims, who think forced marriages and forced conversions are OK as neighbors.  I also don’t want Mexican gangs, or people who think that aids can be cured by raping a virgin for neighbors.  I don’t want to live next to an Ebola patient either.

Any leftist who reads this will most certainly call me racist, and will say that it’s because of white oppression that the 3rd world is the 3rd world.  In fact, Dylan even hints at that in his article:


It’s a typical, tired out, leftist refrain.  White oppression…  Japan got hit with two nukes, how is that for oppression?  How many nukes did Nigeria get hit with?  The Jews were oppressed for over 1000 years, and had their country razed multiple times, and were exiled multiple times.  Does that count as oppression?  Obviously oppression isn’t the answer, and any person who looks at the facts objectively will realize this.  Even if the white man were responsible for keeping the 3rd world backwards, then that would only mean the third world was incompetent for letting themselves be run over by a relatively small people group.  If they had been more industrious they would have no need, or grounds, for blaming others for their problems.

Look at the picture.  The grass is literally greener on the Spanish side of the fence, whereas the Moroccan side looks so much worse.  When two people groups do radically different things with the same land (or any other resource for that matter) it instantly speaks of comparative industriousness and ingenuity, which then leads into implications about relative intelligence and/or morality.  I’m not saying that there are no intelligent 3rd worlders, or that they are completely hopeless.  But the fact is, until the 3rd world develops to the point where they become our equals they have no business being in our countries, or at least the bulk of them do not.  Their countries should look like ours in terms of cleanliness and quality of life before we let any but the most intelligent and moral (if any) of them to come in.  Allowing 3rd world peasants to stay in the 1st world (especially those who arrive illegally) is like giving a man a promotion for doing a bad job.  It makes no sense.  Be a good steward of what you have and you will get more, be a poor steward and what little you have will be taken away.

Until the 3rd world comes up to our level they are not culturally compatible with us, and the result of them becoming the majority in our countries will be a net loss for us and for humanity as a whole.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories ImmigrationTags , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s