The Treason of European Governments

News Source:


The Treason Of European Governments:


First, the governments of Europe throw open the doors for Islamic immigration, bringing hordes of violent cultural-incompatibles to our homeland. “Hate speech” laws are created which make it difficult if not impossible to criticize Islam.


As the number of Muslims grow, they begin to advocate for Shariah law, and we start seeing things like honor killings and Shariah zones where it’s not safe for Europeans to go, even the police. Muslims rape little girls, and Europeans can’t complain because they get accused of “racism.” Accusations of racism can lead to arrest in countries like England, France, and Sweden.


Muslims kill Europeans, Europeans protest and get shut down by their governments. Then, European governments go to the leaders of Muslim countries to ask for a closer alliance. Why is Islam calling the shots for Europe? Why are European governments interested in getting closer to Islam instead of their own people?


The Middle East and North Africa used to be mostly Christian. The Muslims converted those people to Islam through conquest, and following conquest they did it through legal discrimination. Whether by design or sheer unmitigated stupidity, the governments of Europe are acting as the front-men for Islam, and putting in place laws serve the same function as “anti-blasphemy” laws in Muslim countries.


Historically the relationship between Europe and Islam has never been good or friendly. It has been one of almost constant warfare, with Islam continually trying to push its way into Europe, and Europeans resisting. So many of our people were killed, tortured, raped, and enslaved by Islam throughout the Middle Ages. Letting Muslims come in and act like this spits on the sacrifices of our ancestors, who died so that we could be free.
The truth is, the only way you can control or exert influence over a government as a citizen, is to make certain that the people in government see themselves as being part of your group, and perceive that their interests and personal wellbeing are tied in with yours. In Europe we have gotten to the point where the people in government see the native Europeans as their enemy, and are looking to make alliances with other groups. This is not good for the European people, for obvious reasons. It’s starting to get like this in the European colony nations as well.


Democracy is an illusion. It’s not the person who votes that counts, but the person who counts the votes. You can go in and vote, cast a ballot either electronically or manually, but how do you REALLY know that your vote was counted? You don’t know, and you can’t know. You just have to trust the officials. I think this is part of the reason why we have such a severe disconnect between the citizens and the government(s).


Supposedly the way Democracy works is that you elect officials which fall in line with your views, and those people go and make laws and regulations on your behalf. However, the functionality of democracy is predicated on two assumptions which are simply taken for facts but not proven to be facts:


  1. The majority of people who vote have the ability to make sound decisions for the country (which includes themselves and others), and are morally and intellectually qualified to make those decisions.
  2. The votes are actually tallied in an honest fashion.


Obviously democracy does not work, otherwise we would not have gotten to the point where we are now, and obviously the flow of history is not a natural momentum from less freedom to more, otherwise we would not be seeing the continual erosion of freedoms that we now see in the west.


The system of government in Europe now is largely a croc, full of opportunistic traitors who see the European people as an enemy to be opposed and kept down. The leaders of the middle ages were actually much better when it came to being actual leaders. If a king during the middle ages decided that he was going to defect to the side of Islam he would not still be king. Someone else would take his throne and that would be the end of him. But they never would have done that, because they saw their personal survival as being tied in with the continued existence of their nation. They responded to Islamic aggression with force, and as a result they bequeathed to us a safer, cleaner Europe. What have we done with the legacy of our ancestors?


We wasted it. I just hope we can undo some of this before it’s too late.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s