The Corrupt Administrative Class

The days when politicians were loyal to whatever country they rules are long gone, assuming that those days ever existed in the first place.  Still, what we are seeing today is the presence of a growing administrative class.

I just saw this in the news:–election.html

Jeb Bush wants to start something with Russia.  People complain about growing partisanship in Washington, but what’s really scary is when both parties agree on something.  It’s like Elvira said, 99% of what you eat is DEAD, it’s the other 1% which is truly scary.  In this case, we’re not talking about food, but we are still talking about something we are being forced to swallow.  Of course I’m talking about Russia.  Why is it that our politicians are so eager to start a fight with Russia, when Putin has already come out and said that he has nukes and he’s not afraid to use them?

George Washington said that the US should avoid foreign entanglements, but now foreign entanglements are a daily occurrence.

The media is trying to say that we must have either Jeb Bush or Hitlery Clinton.  The media would like that, because both of these candidates are very similar.  I imagine that Hillary would be more overtly pro-gay and anti-Christian, but when it comes to everything else there will be little to no difference.  Neither of them sees Islam as any sort of threat.  Neither of them sees the illegal alien invasion of our country as a threat.  Both of them see “international law” as binding on the US, and neither of them are willing to avoid foreign entanglements.  I will not vote for either of these piles of garbage.

According to new polls, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton aren’t viewed very favorably. (AP Photo)

Voters of America: What exactly is your problem? 

For months, we in the media have been telling you, repeatedly and in very small words, that Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush are going to be the nominees in 2016. They’ve got big money, big names, the comforting ’90s vibe. Their debates will feel like a rerun of “Friends,” before everyone started doing drugs and sleeping with each other.


Bush and Hillary both belong to a new, modern class of politicians which are really an administrative class.  David Cameron of England is another example of this administrative class.  The new administrative class has no loyalty to any country or people group.  They see human beings as tools and servants which are either interchangeable, or which must be forced together in spite of any incompatibilities.  The primary function of the administrative class is to keep fundamentally incompatible people groups from completely killing one another off after said groups have been forced to live within the same area.  The goal is to reduce actual countries to administrative regions with no distinct identity rather than areas where autonomous people groups engage in self rule.  The administrative class does not recognize that any people group has an ancestral claim to any part of the world, or the right to claim any specific part of the world as their home.  They do not see countries as the logical outgrowth of naturally existing people groups, but rather as regions which they (the administrator) can LIVE off of by taxing.

My theory is that the administrative class works for the bankers, who print money for a lot of western countries, and their role is similar to that of Feudal Lords who administered set regions for kings during the dark ages.  What we are entering now is a new dark age, but one where the corrupt ruling class will be aided by technology.

So what is the basis for all this hysteria over Russia?  Russia has not attacked the US even once.  Even during the Cold War they did not attack us.  If Russia annexes the ethnic Russian enclaves in Eastern Europe it won’t hurt us here in the US.  So Jeb Bush says he supports Estonia and Poland, but does he really?  Is Jeb Bush getting ready to support the local nationalist parties in those countries?  Probably not, because he supports multiculturalism.  He’s not pro-Poland, Estonia, or anything.  He is pro-immigration and anti-Russian.

In a sane world, Russia and Putin would be viewed as allies by the west.  They stand as a barrier between Europe and a whole host of savage Islamic countries.  It wasn’t Russians that shot up Charlie Hebdo.  It’s not Russians who blow up school busses, nightclubs, or engage in mass shootings over cartoons.  Russia is being used for a “1984” style “two of hate” where people are encouraged to rail against something without really knowing why, other than the fact that it’s a threat to the administrative class.  Russians are not set to become the majority in Western Europe or the US, nor are they preparing to put us under a fascist ideology where we have no freedom of speech, religion, or association.

The most dangerous outside threat is Islam, which engages in bombings, shootings, honor killings, and acid attacks.  People get attacked for going into Shariah zones in Europe, and yes, there are Shariah zones in England, France, and Sweden now.  The goal of Islam is to put us under Shariah, and their birthrates are dangerously high compared with ours, so if current trends continue they WILL become the majority in western Europe.

Provoking Russia will achieve nothing, and I for one am not willing to take a nuke for Jeb Bush, or a bullet for ANY of these politicians and their egos.  Why should any of us fight for a government, or die for one, which just views us as disposable slaves and minions.  It’s one of the greatest tragedies of history that our soldiers are overseas fighting to protect our freedom and culture (or at least believing so) while our government lets in a whole host of invaders behind their backs.

Why should we support a war with Russia, when the people in Crimea voted to JOIN Russia, and the Russian separatists in Eastern Europe also want to join Russia?  Let them join Russia.  Now, I do not support the violent war between Russian Separatists and Ukrainians.  In fact, I think it’s a shame.  Russians and Ukrainians have much more in common than not in common, and while they fight other parts of Europe are being continually invaded by dangerous outsiders who have NOTHING in common with Europeans.  It is like two men fighting in a burning house, over missing pocket change.  The conflict here is actually between the administrative class and their leaders, and Russia.  It does not stem from irreconcilable differences between Russians and Ukrainians.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s