For a long time I have been anticipating that the Cultural Marxists would eventually start targeting Asian countries. I don’t know why people thought that these subversives would be satisfied with the destruction of western civilization, when one of their major focal points is achieving equality of outcome (except for the elite ruling class). It’s easy to focus on the Cathedral and its depredations when living in the west, but the agenda of the Cultural Marxists is clearly larger than the west.
Meet Ariana Miyamoto, the new Ms. Japan. She is the daughter of a black-American father and a Japanese mother.
Now, I have nothing against race mixing as a matter of principle, and I don’t see race mixing as a moral issue. I also do not begrudge Ariana her existence. Race mixing has always been going on in many parts of the world. The idea that a people group is morally obligated to open its territory to the entire world until they become a minority in their own home is what I have a problem with.
Ariana says she says she wants to start a race revolution in Japan:
“I want to start a revolution,” Miyamoto added with a laugh. “I can’t change things overnight but in 100-200 years there will be very few pure Japanese left, so we have to start changing the way we think.”
The hostility Miyamoto faced sits at odds with a government-sponsored drive to promote the country overseas as “Cool Japan” and entice foreign tourists for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
What she is rooting for, is for the Japanese to go extinct, and she wants to be at the forefront of it. The government seems to be entirely on board, and is making an effort to conflate multiculturalism with “cool.”
To be fair, Japan is already race mixed. The first people in Japan were the Ainu/Jomon, who were Caucasoid, and the Japanese later came over from Korea and replaced them, but now the Japanese have Ainu blood in them, and on top of that there is some ancient South Asian admixture, but that does not mean the people of Japan should be replaced again, or that it justifies bringing in every sort of person in the world until the country is full of people from every single group in the world (regardless of compatibility) and no one has cultural or political dominance.
That is what is truly evil about multiculturalism, not that different groups are able to interact or even intermarry, but that in the end no people group will be sovereign in any part of the world. That sort of thing is good for the administrative class, but horrible for normal people.
Apparently the LGBTXYwhatever movement has made significant inroads in Thailand. A school in Bangkok has decided to relax its uniform code to be more “inclusive”:
Some might find the dress code at Bangkok University—yes, colleges in Thailand often impose a uniform—old-fashioned, with male students required to wear pants and female students assigned skirts. But in a move toward inclusiveness, the school recently announced that it’s A-OK with students switching up the outfits to match their gender identity.
Boys can now wear dresses, and girls can wear the uniform for boys if they want. This is what the Cultural Marxists call progress.
As if that were not enough, the Constitution of Thailand is being amended to formally recognize the existence of three genders:
Panel spokesman Kamnoon Sittisamarn said the new measure would ensure all sexual identities were protected under the constitution and treated equally by the law.
“We are putting the words ‘third gender’ in the constitution because Thai society has advanced,” he told Reuters.
“There are not only men and women, we need to protect all sexes. We consider all sexes to be equal.”
As I have already discussed in my entry, “The Futility of Trans,” there only two sexes. Humanity is a sexually dimorphic species, and this is genetically determined. There are only two sex related chromosomes, not three. It’s just the X Chromosome (XX=female) and Y Chromosome (XY=Male). There is no genetic or scientific basis for a 3rd gender, and how would that even work? Would it be the F Chromosome (F=Fabulous)? Would that pan out like XX, XY, XF, YF? Oops, that would be four sexes. Obviously the entire concept is rot, and writing formal recognition of these delusions into law does not help anyone. When imagination takes the place of reality then things become a slippery slope. Maybe otherkin and zoophiles will be lining up for special consideration? Recognize or die?
Stupid white liberals have started with Burma/Myanmar now:
SITTWE, Myanmar (AP) — American actor Matt Dillon put a rare star-powered spotlight on Myanmar’s long-persecuted Rohingya Muslims, visiting a hot, squalid camp for tens of thousands displaced by violence and a port that has been one of the main launching pads for their exodus by sea.
It was “heartbreaking,” he said after meeting a young man with a raw, open leg wound from a road accident and no means to treat it.
Mothers carrying babies with clear signs of malnutrition stood listlessly outside row after row of identical bamboo huts, toddlers playing nearby in the chalky white dust.
“No one should have to live like this, people are really suffering,” said Dillon, one of the first celebrities to get a look at what life is like for Rohingya in the western state of Rakhine. “They are being strangled slowly, they have no hope for the future and nowhere to go.”
Really? “Strangled slowly”? Constantinople was strangled slowly by the Muslims. Why is it they have nowhere to go? Are Muslim countries in short supply for some reason? Whatever happened to the “alms” pillar of Islam, and why are non-Muslims in any way obligated to Muslims when the Koran says:
“O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” (5:51)
“You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall they abide.” (5:80)
“Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world.” (53:29)
But wait, there’s more. Obama is also leaning on Myanmar to be nice to these Muslims:
US President Barack Obama has said that Myanmar needed to take seriously the issue of how it treats the Rohingya people, if it wanted to be successful in its transition to a democracy.
Obama, speaking to a group of young Asians invited to the White House, said the US was focused on making sure Rohingya, who have been subject to human trafficking or are adrift at sea, are relocated.
Myanmar’s government does not recognise the Rohingya – who make up the majority of the migrants involved in the current crisis – as an ethnic group, arguing instead they are really Bangladeshis. Bangladesh also does not recognise them as citizens.
What I don’t understand is why Myanmar is being held responsible for these people, but not Bangladesh. These people are Bangladeshi, and I doubt the people of Myanmar ASKED them to come. The reason for this is probably that it serves the agenda of the cultural Marxists to disrupt Myanmar with Islam. After all, they also want to flood Europe and the US with Islam. At least here we see the Cultural Marxists are being consistent.
Of course, it does not end with Obama and stupid white celebrities. The UN ALSO wants Myanmar to accomodate these people:
The UN refugee agency and Myanmar have sparred over the plight of the Rohingya ethnic minority at a meeting aimed at tackling the Southeast Asian migrant crisis in Bangkok.
Representatives from 17 nations are meeting in the Thai capital on Friday for talks on the crisis, which has seen thousands of desperate people flee on boats across the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea aiming for Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
Myanmar’s delegate to the talks in Bangkok rebuked the UN’s refugee agency for calling on the country to recognise the Muslim Rohingya minority as citizens to stem their exodus from its shores.
I am fresh out of sympathy for Islam, if I ever had any in the first place. I cannot lightly ignore the mass murder, forced conversion, rape, slavery, and genital mutilation which is it continually responsible for. Islam is a death machine, which is continually pushing forward to conquer the world.
On what basis are the people of Myanmar responsible for the Rohingya? What do the people of Myanmar have to gain by having large enclaves of Muslims in their country? The answer to both questions is none, and nothing. The people who stand to benefit from this are the Cultural Marxists, the administrative class, and of course the Muslims.
Legitimizing the presence of these people in Myanmar will only encourage more illegals to pour in, just as the policies of the Democrats in the US are encouraging more Mexicans and Guatemalans to pour into our country. If other Asian countries are compelled to adopt these people, then they will each have a group of hostile foreign Muhammadans in their midst, who will reproduce at a rate faster than that of the native people. There is no way to overstress the seriousness of this problem that Islam poses to any country which lets it in.
I think the people of Myanmar, and their government, deserve to be congratulated for not granting birthright citizenship to hostile foreign incompatibles and illegal aliens. We should adopt similar policies in the US. This goes to show that the people of Myanmar still strongly conceptualize themselves as a people, rather than just people who happen to live within a certain set of administrative/political boundaries. This is what the Cultural Marxists hate, because it undermines their plans.
So here I have given three examples of how Cultural Marxists are working to engage in genocide against Asians. Cultural Marxists are working towards establishing a world-wide international socialist/communist dictatorship. Multiculturalism, feminism, homosexuality, and socialism are all heads on the same beast, they are not isolated issues. They seek to subvert national sovereignty by erasing nations of people through subversive policies. It is a slow genocide, and they attempt to remain in the shadows by controlling the dialectic.
For example, the first topic of this entry is “racist,” the second example is “homophobic,” and the third is “Islamophobic” and maybe also “racist.” It’s no coincidence that ALL three of those words were created by Marxists. Those words were created so that if you say something that calls attention to the problems they are created, you can be written off as a “bad person,” and therefore “good” people are under no obligation to listen to what you have to say.
But I digress, each of these examples I have given is toxic to civilized society. They all result in LESS of the targeted people group, and an erosion of culture and sovereignty. I’ll break it down further.
Multiculturalism is an immediate attack on sovereignty and cultural self-determination, as the result of it is that people become a minority in their own country.
The promotion of the gay alphabet soup undermines the integrity of the family, and religion, as it usually comes with speech censorship laws, and laws requiring involuntary association. If people are not forming families, then their population will shrink.
The presence of Islam is an immediate security risk, but in the long term it’s a demographic threat, as Muslims often reproduce at a higher rate than people of other belief systems. A few Muslims now can result in many Muslims later. Any one of them could blow up or engage in a shooting at any time. Even giving them a car is dangerous, because they might decide to run off the road and hit some infidels, as they have done in Jerusalem. Also, Muslims start demanding special treatment LONG before they become the majority.
This is how it is. We need to all stand in alliance against the Cultural Marxists.