Explaining the Cathedral

So I was having a conversation with my wife the other day, attempting to explain PC and how the Cathedral works.

My wife is new to the US, and she comes from a country where Cultural Marxists have yet to make any significant inroads.  Actually, when she first came to the US she got an immediate dose of culture shock.  The TSA agent that processed her was this thing which may have been a man trying to be a woman, or a woman trying to be a man.  The voice and size of the creature indicated being male, but it had boobs and an effeminate way of speaking.  A sad and disgraceful introduction to the US, but I digress.

Those of us who grew up in western countries all innately understand how the Cathedral works, but to a person with no previous exposure, it seems remarkably incoherent, and that’s because it is.

So the topic was Mel Gibson, and how the leftist culture has this fetish for perpetually destroying people for their entire lives, making them “pay” until they’re dead.

Mel Gibson said that Jews were responsible for all the world’s problems, and since then he’s been “excommunicated” and has not (as far as I know) produced any new movies.  Why is this?  Is it because the left is pro-Jewish?  No, the left hates Israel and loves the durka durkas.  Being an anti-semite is not even a hiccup for the left, which has a long and blatant history of anti-semitism.

Also, Mel Gibson was drunk, and given how the left drinks and uses narcotics, they should know that when you’re under the influence you say things that you normally wouldn’t, not just because your inhibitions are down, but also because your way of thinking and looking at things is altered by the substance.  Mel Gibison came out and apologized, and I believe he was sincere, and he’s done a lot less to abuse the Jewish people than Barack Osama.

That being said, I explained to my wife that it’s not so much what a person says that matters but WHO says it.  Mel Gibson loses his career over his drunken comment, but no one in a position of influence bats an eyelid at what George Takai said about Clarence Thomas:

“He is a clown in blackface sitting on the Supreme Court,” said Takei. “He gets me that angry. He doesn’t belong there.”

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/03/george-takei-clarence-thomas-clown-in-blackface_n_7719110.html

Since George Takai is gay and a leftist, and since Clarence Thomas is a conservative, it’s “acceptable” for Takai to abuse Clarence Thomas.  George Takai’s career is not going to take a hit, but Mel Gibson’s was knocked out.

If George Takai had been straight and right wing, and if Clarence Thomas had voted for the “gay marriage” ruling, and if George had made the exact same comment, then that would have been it for George.

If Mel Gibson had been a flaming leftist and cultural subversive, then his drunken comment would have been swept under the rug and forgotten, if it had ever been made public in the first place.

This is the insanity we’re operating under, and if it continues unabated we won’t have any country left.  The only good thing about this insanity is that it can’t go on forever, but that’s only because it will wreck everything until there’s nothing left to destroy.  Then, the survivors will have to pick up the fragments and ruins, and attempt to rebuild.

Advertisements

Published by:

Radamanthes

I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , 2 Comments

2 thoughts on “Explaining the Cathedral”

  1. Haha be careful… she may have one foot on the way back to India. Actually on that note, there’s a large transgender subculture in India. I forgot what they’re called, but I assume they’re more insulated than transpeople here. Though I’d be surprised if she never heard of it.

    Like

    1. She’s been getting angry with cultural Marxism and the left by increments since getting here. It started with seeing how much money the state and fed government skim from my paycheck, then finding out about welfare. Also there’s the sudden obtrusion of homosexual characters and themes into TV series’ she likes, finding out about illegal aliens, etc.

      The other day we pulled into a store, and this other car with some kind of Central Americans pulled in, and when she saw them she muttered something about how they just let anyone in even if they can’t speak English. I think it’s probably only a matter of time before she becomes a full fledged redneck.

      As for India, sometimes I think about running there. It is an interesting place, and for the most part the government is out of people’s personal lives. But the grinding reality of daily life in India is very rough compared to what we have in the US. It’s not something you can just slip into with ease, and theft and squatting are epidemic over there. One time my wife left her purse in a restaurant, and she was surprised when someone followed us to the car and gave it to us. Apparently in India if you leave your purse then that’s it, you’re not getting it back.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s