Orange is the New Gay

The other day my wife was looking for something new to watch on Netfix, and she decided to try “Orange is the New Black.”  Right away I said, “Don’t watch it.”

When she asked me why not, I told her that it was pop culture garbage designed to appeal to foolish and simple minded people.

“But it won an Emmy award, so it has to be good,” she says.

My wife still has not yet figured out the pattern of Cultural Marxism and degeneracy which plagues our country, and to a greater extent the west in general.

I told her that, best case scenario, the show won an award because it appealed to the lowest common denominator, and that the target audience was the most simple and low IQ members of the population.  I then went on to suggest that the actual reason the series won was probably because the Emmys are biased and on board with a particular agenda, but she decided to watch it anyways.

Within the first two minutes there was a lesbian gay scene.  My wife got mad and turned if off, and I said, “I told you so.”

How did I know the series would be rubbish?  Because most things today are rubbish.  When it comes to pop-culture things it’s usually because they appeal to the lowest common denominator, which would be an IQ of about 100 (although this is descending toward 90).  Aside from that, the pop-culture things are often trying to push a subversive agenda.  By that I mean they are trying push the envelope for what is considered acceptable behavior, or to sugar coat things which people have been traditionally hostile toward (like Islam and homosexuality).  So basically, appealing to the lowest sorts of people, and, making those people worse is the goal of pop-culture entertainment.

Of course, even without knowing what I know about modern pop-culture degeneracy, a series about women in prison only has so much potential, as it showcases the baser elements of our society.  Usually when people are in prison it’s for a reason.  I don’t really care much for series that focus primarily on dregs being dregs.  The culinary equivalent of this series would be like pouring out the juice from a hundred glasses, collecting all the dregs into one cup, and drinking it.  Why would anyone want to do that?  I don’t know, but the fact that there is an interest in such series’ is a clear sign of cultural, moral, and intellectual decay.

I really miss the 50’s, even though I wasn’t around back then, when the primary goal of popular culture entertainment was to ENTERTAIN, and the secondary goal was to portray a positive message.  Today the primary goal is to dumb down and celebrate corruption.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories culture, decay, degneracy, orange is the new blackLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s