Cuckservative Explained (and how not to be one)

The “cuckservative”  meme has been getting more attention recently, and the attention comes from both the SJW’s and nominal conservatives who are actually neocons (neocon is really an oxymoron when you stop to think about it).

Definition:

In short, a cuckservative is someone who identifies as conservative but ultimately capitulates to the left on most things, like the establishment GOP.

Many, if not most, of the Republicans are like a stock car plastered with the labels of hundreds of corporations, and as a result they have to obey their donors when coming into power.  This is why, under the best of circumstances all that they do is maintain the status quo.  They seldom to never undo the changes of the Democrats.

The term “cuckservative” is an allusion to cuckolding.  Like a weak man who watches impotently as his wife lies with another man, and who raises the bastard children of that other man, so does the establishment GOP adopt and continue policies that did not originate with them.

For example, the Republicans SHOULD have undone the socialist changes instituted by FDR (who also created the central bank/Federal Reserve), and the socialist changes of LBJ (who bought the black vote by giving them money, even though he was deeply disdainful of blacks and called them niggers.  He also referred to Jews as “cocksuckers.”).  The Republicans had the legal and moral imperative to undo those things, but instead they just accept and enforce the new policies.  They think the battle is to water them down, and if they can take the edge off (a little) then they have won a victory.  But a loss is still a loss, even if there are a few less casualties.

The Democrats are the only party in US politics devoted to actual change.  Of course, the change they want is entirely subversive, as it is grounded in Critical Theory, and inspired by such things as Alinskyite radicalism and Keyenesian economics.  They want to destroy western civilization and replace it with a communism.  Whether they move fast, or the move slow, they still move forward with their plans (they even call themselves “progressives”), so the battle plan for dealing with these people cannot be to slow them down, implement their policies, and hope they will eventually stop.  That’s not a battle plan, it’s a surrender plan.

“Cuckservative” is not a derisive synonym for all conservatives, but rather for RINOS/establishment GOP, and more broadly, for people who call themselves conservative but adopt socialist and SJW positions.

How not to be a cuckservative in your personal life:

You might be a cuckservative if you find yourself bending over backwards to prove to leftists (and others) that you are not racist, or just mean.  I say this because in order to take them seriously on this matter you must have adopted some of their narrative, and must think like them to a certain degree.

It’s no coincidence that both SJW’s and mainstream conservatives who have become aware of the term are claiming that it originated with “white supremacists.”  This is an old Marxist shaming tactic.  The purpose is to get you off topic from the actual argument and into a position where you have to defend yourself on a personal level.

Even if you are one of the “safest”  and most “moderate” conservatives, if you live in a multiracial neighborhood, marry a black woman, adopt kids from all over the world, don’t own guns, and seriously and vocally proclaim that anyone and everyone can be an American (or whatever), the leftists will STILL call you a racist and Nazi just for being a white male who disagrees with them on anything.  This is why it’s better not to waste time and energy trying to prove that you’re not “racist” or to get them to like you.  It’s a complete waste of time.

The term “racist” was actually created by Karl Marx, as a means to slap a negative label on his opponents.  Since then the mainstream and modern left has doctored the definition of racist to restrict it to white people, with particular negative emphasis on the white man.  In their mind you are racist by default, and no amount of empirical evidence to the contrary is ever going to change their minds.

A real conservative (and right wing person in general) would dismiss such claims with a hand-waive, as they aren’t relevant to anything if you’re a law abiding citizen.  It’s better to stay on topic when contending with the left.  The left has to make up terms like “racist,” “homophobe,” “Islamophobe,” and “sexist,” because they can’t win in a rational discussion about policy and economics, or anything for that matter.

The key to dealing with the left is to stop showing weakness and trying to get them to like you.  A true right wing person is not concerned with being liked, especially by people who hate him by default.  Our concern is to be left alone, not to be loved.  If you have the ability to be left alone you can get away from the people who don’t like you.

So here is what to do when the left calls you racist:

1. Say “so what?”  The most they can do at this point is say, “HA!  I knew it!” and then they will either go away or the discussion will return to actual policy.  Either way you win.

2. You can say, “I don’t care if you think I’m racist.”  This is my preferred tactic.  When you do this, there is a good chance they will come back and say, “So, you admit to being racist!”  You can either ignore this, or you can say, “I admit nothing, except that I don’t care what you think.”  They really have no place to go from there.

3. Ignore and continue.  You can ignore the accusation of racism and just deal with the questions of policy and operate within the realm of facts and logic.  The leftist will continue to play up the racism accusation, but eventually they will either drop it or have an incoherent emotional melt down.  Either way you win.

If they try and connect you with white supremacists you can point out that every kind of non-white supremacist supports the Democrats (or whatever happens to be the main left wing party).  Obviously an actual white supremacist (which are very few and far between) is not going to vote for the leftist party (even if he espouses socialism) because most of the modern left wing movements are founded in Critical Theory, which portrays white people as villains.  So really it is irrelevant how they vote, and bringing them up at all is a red herring.

The point is, there are so many things you can do rhetorically without capitulating when dealing with the left.  If you don’t feel confident, and the only thing you know how to do is capitulate then you should probably keep quiet and avoid contact with leftists as much as possible.  Hang out with other right wing people and (if you have the need) try to receive your validation (and maybe therapy) from them.

And coming back to the topic of cuckolding, the left is absolutely like a slutty woman who is only mediocre (at best) in terms of looks.  The left even organizes slut walks.  The slut knows she doesn’t have much to offer objectively, but she’s going to take as much as she can get.  If you court or marry the slut then she is going to be unfaithful, and if you capitulate, condone, or excuse her behavior she is only going to disdain you and behave more brazenly.  What you need to do is tell the slut you’re not interested, and if you must interact with the slut at all, then it needs to be completely on your terms.  You cannot, for even one second, allow the slut to set the terms of the engagement.  Take charge or avoid contact.

If you need lessons on how to be a man, then do not look to modern TV series or cinema.  After the 80’s they started doing away with masculine archetypes in popular entertainment.  Look to those who are further to the right than you, or who display characteristics that you admire and wish you could have for yourself.

“That’s no way to treat someone who’s telling you the truth.”

Advertisements

Published by:

Radamanthes

I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s