Somalia and Hard Truth

Yesterday my wife saw something about children starving in Somalia, and it made her very depressed.  This started a discussion between us.  She was trying to find a solution to the problem of starvation in Somalia, and my final answer was “The best thing you can do is not look at those videos.”

Reality is ugly, but it’s where we live, so we must accept the truth of our existence.  Here is the truth about Somalia:

Somalia is a poverty-stricken, violent, oppressive, Islamic hellhole.  There is no way to give those people food or money without it ending up in the hands of warlords and terrorists.  Our government tried to help, and the end result was that the terrorists got the supplies, and the bodies of our soldiers were dragged through the streets while people kicked them.

Bringing these people to the US may seem benevolent, but most of them will get on welfare and breed.  Furthermore, most of them seriously want Shariah law.  Coming across a border does not magically change who and what people are, especially if they are rewarded or excused for being the way they are.  These are violent, low IQ, Islamic people, and they continue to act in a violent and criminal fashion after being brought to the US.  It is against our interest and well being to bring them here.  On a more general note, I don’t think Africa on the whole is a good source of immigration.  I would give immigration preference to people from 1st world countries, and would severely curtail immigration from the 3rd world.  No Muslim should ever be viewed as a refugee.  The bulk of them are killers and terrorists, or people who approve of the killers and terrorists.

Aside from the fact that those children in Somalia will never get any of the aid money or food you might send, most of them are going to grow up to be Islamic maniacs who think it’s OK to kill people for insulting Muhammad.  Some of them will grow up to be pirates and menace the citizens of other countries out on the seas.

I doubt you will get any Christian missionaries into Somalia, because they don’t want their citizens abandoning Islam, and even if you did get in most people would want to kill you as soon as they find out why you’re there.  On the other hand, they won’t necessarily even bother to speculate why you are there, as they can use you as a hostage regardless of your reason for being there.

Really the only way to help those people would be to free them from Islam.  North Africa used to be mostly Christian, at least, ostensibly, as did Syria and the Levant.  Muslims invaded forcefully, and after their initial killing spree, they put all the Christians and Jews under the Jizya tax.  They had to pay a tax in order to keep their religion.  The other choices were to convert or die.  But what kind of choices are those?  So if a guy lost his job it would mean a death sentence, or to surrender and start worshiping a different/false god.  Aside from that, there was institutional discrimination barring Christians and Jews from holding government positions, and preferential hiring that favored Muslims in the private sector.  People would convert to Islam due to socio-economic pressures, even if they could pay the Jizya.  If a Christian or Jew converted to Islam, and decided it wasn’t for him, then he’s stuck.  If they wanted to leave Islam there was a death sentence.

Coming back to Somalia, we could colonize it and put them under a reverse Shariah, which would make it impossible for them to build or repair mosques without our permission, put a tax on them for being Muslim, ban them from marrying non-Muslims, and discriminate against them in the area of employment for being Muslims.  But would we really be willing to kill them for remaining Muslims and failing to pay the tax, or for converting back to Islam after having left it?  That would be the quickest way to de-Islamize Somalia, and that’s how the Muslims transformed North Africa from Christian to Muslim.  The idea of forced conversion and killing people for their beliefs sits ill with me, and to do so would not be a proper Christian behavior.  Forcefully converting people is Islamic, not Christian, and if we adopt Islamic methods then we’re not spreading proper Biblical Christianity.  On the other hand, even a Soviet style communist takeover which bans all “religion” and forces everyone to be atheists would be an improvement for Somalia and the surrounding region.

At the end of the day the best we can do to balance the pragmatic with the morally acceptable is to have nothing at all to do with countries like Somalia.  Sending aid without conditions is pointless, and enforcing any conditions without conquest is futile, and on top of that I have no desire to subsidize the next generations of psychotic Muslims.  Hitler was a child once, as was Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin, and Muhammad.  If any of those people had never made it to adulthood the world today would be a better place.   Furthermore, if I have extra money I would rather spend it to breed my own children than support the progeny of someone else, especially if I don’t have any say in what ideology those kids are being raised in.  I have more of a vested interest and potential for legacy in propagating my own culture than an alien culture.


Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s