In The News: Planned Parenthood, African Illegals, Japan

Going to briefly comment on some news articles:

U.S. warns states against defunding Planned Parenthood

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-warns-states-against-defunding-planned-parenthood-223907535–business.html

The U.S. government has warned states moving to defund women’s health group Planned Parenthood that they may be in conflict with federal law, officials said on Wednesday.

First of all, the government is not the US.  The liberal media frequently makes the error of conflating the government with the US.  In fact it’s not really even the government, it’s the subversive Democrat party which happens to be in charge right now, at least, in charge of the executive branch.

It’s time for state governments to start telling the Feds to kick rocks.  What is the worst they can do?  The best way to stop an actual bully, is to stand up and stop letting them push you around.  What can Obama do if everyone tells him no?  The state governments are probably the only level at which the GOP are still actually conservative.  I tend to support state level GOP, whereas when it comes to Congress they seem to be in bed with the Dems.

No tax money should be diverted to PP, and if state taxes are going to fund this abomination, then the least the governors can do is stop funding it at their level.  No matter how you feel about whether or not humans have souls, or whether that soul exists at conception (when the DNA for the new individual is created), or when the brain begins to form, it’s a fact that PP is cutting apart unborn babies, stabbing them in their brains, and selling body parts.  It’s disgusting, and it reminds me of how the Mongols used to cut people up and stack their heads, how the Caananites used to sacrifice their children, how the Aztecs used to rip hearts out, and so on and so forth.  It’s disgusting, evil, and shameful.

EU says world facing worst refugee crisis since WWII

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/eu-says-world-facing-worst-refugee-crisis-since-113228429.html

First of all, it’s not a “crisis” it’s an invasion.  This “migration” only has to be a “crisis” if people are too weak to defend their borders.  Yes, if you flood your country with Muslims and Africans it’s going to be a crisis for every single native person in your country.  Going to the store, a normally safe and pedestrian task, will become a risk for women and children walking unaccompanied.

If you bring in 3rd worlders to the point where they become a majority then you will have a 3rd world country, especially if the 3rd worlders are the lowest members of the country they come from.

The 3rd world in general is not a good source of immigrants.  There is a reason why the 3rd world is the 3rd world.  The chances that these immigrants will be culturally compatible, or intellectually equal to your native population, are extremely low, especially when those coming represent the low end of the population they came from.  And these people do represent the low end.  They are largely illiterate peasants.

Avramopoulos, speaking after a trip to Athens on Thursday, said Europe as a whole was struggling with a surge in migrants, with the situation in Greece “particularly urgent” as almost 50,000 people arrived there last month.

“What we must do and the (European) Commission has done it, is to organise our system in order to face this problem in a decent, civilised and European way,” he added.

Why does civilized have to mean weak and capitulating?  I’m sure Neville Chamberlain thought he was being terribly civilized to Hitler.

You don’t deal with invaders by being nice to them and showing weakness.  I have a lot to say on this issue of African migration/invasion, but I will say that it’s absolutely absurd to allow people to stay just because they crossed your border.

“Oh, they stepped into Europe, now we can’t do anything about so we have to just put them in housing and give them welfare.”

No, you can do something about it.  Look to El Cid, Charles Martel, Emperor Hadrian, Emperor Constantine, Count Dracula, etc., for the real European solution on how to deal with invaders.  As long as “European” is a synonym for weakness there are going to be bad results.

If you’re not willing to fight for your country and way of life then you will lose both.

Japanese leader Abe stops short of apology for World War II

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/japanese-leader-shinzo-abe-expresses-profound-grief-perished-091349145.html

The question here is, why do Japanese people have to apologize at all, and how much longer do they have to apologize for?

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe acknowledged Friday that Japan inflicted “immeasurable damage and suffering” on innocent people in World War II, but stopped short of offering his own apology and said future generations of Japanese should not have to make them either.

They should not have to apologize, they had nothing at all to do with WWII, and Japan was already severely punished for WWII.  A lot of their people were killed, and they had two nukes dropped on them.

“On the 70th anniversary of the end of the war, I bow my head deeply before the souls of all those who perished both at home and abroad,” Abe said in a 25-minute address delivered live on national television. “I express my feelings of profound grief and my eternal, sincere condolences.”

I would just stop that altogether.  There is no reason to continue this humiliating ritual, and it only encourages people to keep complaining and targeting them.  When you act weak people will come after you.

The statement was closely watched by Japan’s neighbors, especially South Korea and China, and it was unclear whether it would satisfy them.

Obviously nothing will satisfy them if they want statements every year.  It’s time to stop caring about whether or not they are satisfied.

Abe noted that more than 80 percent of the country’s population was born after the war, and echoed growing though not universal sentiment in Japan that the country has apologized enough.

“We must not let our children, grandchildren and even further generations to come, who have nothing to do with that war, be predestined to apologize,” he said.

This is really so obvious it shouldn’t have to be said.  Yes, people can’t be held responsible for a war they had nothing to do with it.  No one can help what people group they were born into.  You can pick your friends, and you can pick your nose, but you can’t pick your family.

I don’t at all agree with people apologizing for something their ancestors may or may not have done, and when it comes to Japan and Nazi Germany, it’s important not to overlook that people who lived in those countries during the war weren’t exactly free to disagree with their governments.  People were also forced into the service.

Also, I don’t agree that WWII should be the defining characteristic of Japanese history, or European history for that matter.  It was a blip in time compared with the full length of their history, and neither the Japanese nor the Nazis were as brutal or devastating as other historical conquerors, like the Mongols or Assyrians.

I don’t abide people being ashamed of their heritage, it’s a disgrace, and it’s embarrassing to watch.  I do however think that Shinzo Abe’s statement is a big step in the right direction, and I think the Japanese people are doing better than the bulk of white people who basically decided to internalize the guilt for the actions of Nazi Germany, even though more white people were killed by Hitler than anyone else, the fact that he did more damage to Europe than the Mongols, and the fact that a lot of Europeans died to stop him.  Both sides of the war in Europe were actually nationalists at the time.  Neither side embraced multiculturalism during the 40’s.

But coming back to Japan, it is my hope that they will also rebuild their military.  They deserve to have a military, and to engage in self determination.  The Chinese government has no room to talk critically of Japan, when they occupy Tibet and persecute Christians.  And again, Japan had two nukes dropped on them.

Yes, what the Japanese GOVERNMENT did during WWII was not very nice, but what the Chinese government and North Korean government are doing today also isn’t very nice.  It appears that there is no pan-Asian solidarity in Asia.  If I were Asian I would see the Japanese as brothers, regardless of my ethnicity.  Furthermore, I would respect them as they were the first Asian nation to industrialize.  They are a good role model for the rest of Asia.  Really the Chinese should have industrialized first, after all, they are the oldest contiguous civilization in the world, have a long history of meritocracy, and are the homeland of Confucius.  But for some reason they were puffing opium while Japan was industrializing.  Who’s fault was that?  Misplaced priorities.

Advertisements

Published by:

Radamanthes

I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s