On Flag Burning Leftists

So I had an encounter with Jesse Benn on Twitter.  I got blocked for asking him if he thought it was OK for government to pick winners and losers.  Obviously he does, because that’s what affirmative actions is all about, and the justification for it is predicated loosely on the idea that white people deserve to suffer.  There are a lot of white people who are thoroughly emasculated and will just sigh and agree, but then there are others (like myself), who will not even pretend to be sympathetic.

I’ll break it down: I care about myself, my family, and my kid(s) before I care about anyone else.  Any policies which adversely affect me in favor of someone else are not something I can get on board with.  I have no sympathy.  Maybe when all my needs are met I MIGHT begin to care (liberals should understand that since they believe in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs).  But, under the best of circumstances affirmative action IS government picking winners and losers, and is not conducive to meritocracy.  I find it interesting how the left is so concerned about Silicon Valley engineers being mostly white and Asian, but they never say a word about professional sports teams being mostly black.

Anyways, I want to talk about Jesse Benn and his flag burning video.  Back when the left had it’s mad rage-gasm over the Confederate flag, and certain emasculated suppliers (Walmart, Amazon) decided to stop selling the flag, a lot of us who are either southern or pro-south had to listen to liberals, especially those in Muffington Boast, go on about how we were traitors for having the “Confederate Flag.”

Well, first of all, the stars and bars is not the Confederate Flag, it’s the battle flag of General Lee.  Second, I never heard anyone calling people traitors for waiving around a state flag.  Even though the stars and bars was a battle flag, it has since then come to symbolize the south and southern culture.

Yes, the south has it’s own culture which is different from the midwest and coastal states, especially the liberal states.  White liberals have no issue recognizing that black Americans have their own culture, but for some reason they have a serious hiccup when it comes to recognizing that southerners also do.  The black-American culture BTW is an outgrowth of southern culture, albeit a debased one.  Their ghetto dialect derives from the southern accent, and their “soul food” derives from eating preferences down here.  Anyone who thinks otherwise has obviously never had actual African food before.

That being said, being called a traitor by a Muffington Boast leftist (which is a subversive organization), is like being called short by a midget, or like being called a whore by a harlot.  It just carries no weight, and it’s interesting that libtards, who are continually hating on traditional America, and which are pro-Islam, in favor of open borders, and who wish to subordinate the US to the UN, would all of a sudden decide to start using “traitor” as an insult.

I have said it before, but the same people who go on about how they hate the Rebel flag, and who call us traitors for having it, are the same people who burn the American flag.

Here is an example, courtesy of Jesse Benn:

First of all, political statement or not, it’s not very smart to destroy something after having paid money for it.  Second, I can’t help  notice that most of the people in this video (with one possible exception) are white.  Given that the crowd is 99% white liberal, it makes no sense for him to have put this video to some ghetto rap music (which is so garbled I can only understand about half the words).  It would have made more sense for him to put it to something white libtards actually listen to, like Lady Gaga or Katy Perry.

In fact, I’m going to suggest an experiment, watch this video in one tab and mute the sound, then set “Poker Face” to play in another tab, and see which sound track goes better with this video.

I mean, seriously, these guys are white liberals…  They don’t look tough, hard, or threatening on a personal basis.  Probably half the reason this crowd exists is because of having eaten too much soy.  Furthermore, burning the American flag, or the Rebel flag, is not “edgy,” it’s overdone and cliche, and it makes the flag burners look like complete jack asses (which is what they are).  So another Muffington Boast clown is letting their true nature show.  I knew the whole “traitor”/faux-patriotism stuff would only be a short burst of manufactured rage-gasm.  They would very quickly return to the usual routine.

The only thing I find truly upsetting here is the usual issue I take with leftists in general: If they hate America so much they should leave and go to a place where their values are the rule of the land, rather than continually trying to subvert the country.

What truly bothers me about this, is that these

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s