Syrian “Refugees” In Europe

Of course the bulk of “refugees” are Africans, but there is also a serious problem with Syrian refugees.

Nice that Muslims can “flee” to Europe (not sure from what exactly), but if Europe becomes Muslim then where are Europeans supposed to go?  Are we to become a minority in our own homeland as the ethnic Egyptians have become in their country?  If the left loves Islam so much they should get up and move to durka land.  We do not want to participate in their social experiments.  We never signed up for or agreed to this sort of thing.

I am not at all pro-democracy, but in this case I might support a vote on whether or not Muslims should be allowed into Europe.  Obviously they will never hold such a referendum vote because they already know how it will go; NO MUSLIMS IN EUROPE.

Politicians won’t run on this issue or talk about it, because “dat be raycis” (even though Pisslam isn’t a race), and in any case most of them are in favor of demographic replacement because it’s getting harder to find Europeans stupid enough to vote for their retarded left wing policies.  They would rather change the people than the policies in order to stay in power.

As ironic as it may seem, this sort of treasonous cuckoldry is where democracy leads, because instead of getting rulers that feel an attachment to the people they govern, you get career politicians who want to get paid for power, enjoying both the pay and the power while feeling no connection to the people they govern.  In fact, they don’t see themselves as governing people, but as administrating geographic areas.  If there’s a threat to their power, well, then it’s time to bring in a different sort of people in order to ensure their position.

But I put it to you, that Islam is 100% antithetical to western civilization.  These people will only bring death and decay to Europe.  Islam creates places like Egypt, Gaza, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Afghanistan.  It creates organizations like ISIS, Hamas, Al Qaida, Hizballah, Boko Haram, et al.  Do you want ISIS in Europe, destroying historical sites that are thousands of years old, killing museum curators, enslaving your women and passing them around as sex toys between themselves?  That’s what they do.

So here is the article:

Italian navy rescues 4,400 migrants off Libya coast

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/italian-navy-rescues-4-400-migrants-off-libya-152758848.html

MILAN (Reuters) – The Italian navy organised the rescue of around 4,400 migrants in waters off the Libyan coast on Saturday, prompted by requests for help received from nearly two dozen boats, in one of the biggest multi-national operations so far.

Italy’s coast guard said in a statement on Sunday that it had coordinated rescue efforts involving numerous vessels, including a Norwegian and an Irish ship as part of the European Union’s Triton rescue mission.

–How insane is it to go out of your way to bring in illegal aliens who are 100% culturally incompatible?  I mean, at least in the US our government waits until they step foot in our country before claiming that they can’t do anything about it.  This is going above and beyond, reaching out beyond the borders, bringing them in, and acting not only like it can’t be helped, but also acting like it’s a moral imperative.  OK, so you (leftists) want to bring in durkas and Africans.  At what point will decide that there are enough and stop bringing in more?  What’s the upper limit?  Is there an upper limit?  It seems that the governments of Europe are in an awful hurry to facilitate this invasion.

Sweden I can understand, because that country is thoroughly cucked and known for weakness and self-hate/oikophobia.  I mean, “Stockholm Syndrome” is named after a city in Sweden.  But Italy?  Why?  The fact that the government of Italy is involved with this is a clear indicator that democracy does not really allow people to exert long term control over their government.

Europe is struggling to cope with a record influx of refugees as people flee war in countries such as Syria.

–It’s not a struggle if you don’t let them in.  You can sink the boats.  If you think sinking them and killing all those invaders (which is what our ancestors would have done at any time before WWII), then turn the boats around, force them back to Syria, and after everyone is off sink the boats.  I mean, this isn’t hard.  If you’re struggling it makes no sense to further exacerbate the problem.

The migrants were travelling aboard inflatable dinghies and overcrowded boats, the coast guard said.

The Mediterranean has become the world’s most deadly crossing point for migrants. More than 2,300 people have died this year in attempts to reach Europe by boat, according to the International Organisation for Migration.

Apparently it’s not deadly enough of they are still able to get into Europe.  Europe is for Europeans.  Durka land is for durkas.  Why does Europe have to be turned into Syria?  There should be no immigrants from Syria allowed (with the exception of Christians) until Syria looks like Europe.  If it never gets to that level then they don’t get to come.  They will just recreate the conditions they left as long as they retain their values, beliefs, and culture.  This is so obvious.

Many are seeking alternative routes to Western Europe.

–No entry.  They don’t belong in Europe.  Letting these people into Europe not only spits on the hard work and sacrifice of our ancestors who fought to keep them out, but it also robs our children of the environment our ancestors worked so hard to create.

On Saturday, thousands of rain-soaked migrants stormed across Macedonia’s border as police lobbed stun grenades and beat them with batons, seeking to enforce a decree to stem their flow through the Balkans to western Europe.

–So wait, these cucks dropped the durkas in Greece?  Swedes and Italians went OUT of their way to “rescue” a bunch of Muhammadens, and dropped them in Greece?  When I first read this, my though (sadly) was, “I hope Golden Dawn will do something.”

I could never give Golden Dawn or any other neo-nazi or fascist group my full support.  An all white government that crawls up under your skin is still a government that crawls up under your skin.  Furthermore, redistribution of wealth in favor of the intellectually lower end of any gene pool is still that.  But, I don’t want Europe invaded.

Maybe what the left wants is to expand the culture of US prisons (where you have to join a race gang to keep from getting beaten or unwillingly sodomized) to public life in both Europe and the US.

What kind of choice is it if you have you have to side between one brand of fascist supremacists and another?  That’s severely jacked up.  Not all of us like fascism.  A lot of us just want to be left alone.  Some people want to be left alone in order to chase after wealth and hedonistic satisfaction, while others want to be left alone to pursue a more traditional lifestyle.  But both those groups will have to pick a side.

Obviously the better choice for Europeans will be to side with the fascist ideology which is nativist rather than foreign, because if they join with Islam they will have to give up thousands of years of culture and civilization.  There may be a few stupid white women who side with Islam because of their deep (artificially produced, via feminism) hatred for the white man, but in general this is how it will go down.

We can probably already guess which side the leftist governments will take, but the leftist governments will not be spared by the Muslims.

This is an ugly, sad, pathetic choice, which would never have come into existence were it not for retarded and treasonous left wing politics, and rubbish ideas like democracy and egalitarianism.

Advertisements

Published by:

Radamanthes

I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s