Trolled by Facebook: “Equality Day”

So I logged into facebook the other day, and I saw this in my feed:

equality day

At first I thought someone was trolling me, but then I realized that this was a mass message from the facebook corporation, and that it probably went to everyone.  It could be that they are trying to blanket troll people, but as most people have been conditioned to think that allowing everyone vote is a moral imperative, I came to the conclusion that this is probably a plug for multiculturalism, and beyond that just general leftist preaching/propaganda.

Don’t thank me, I’m not striving for equality.

So first of all, I’m not committed to equality or any other false utopian visions.  There is no equality.  People are inherently unequal.  If not then everyone would be the same height, same age, look the same, and have the same IQ.  Inequality is a natural outgrowth of differences between people, and all the left wing attempts to create equality usually resort in wanton abuse, keeping one person down for the benefit of another, and sometimes it results in mass murder.

Also, I couldn’t care less about people being able to vote.  Letting everyone vote is not a moral imperative.  Not all opinions and ideas are equally valid.  Only intelligent people should be allowed to make decisions that affect entire countries, and most people lack the basic intelligence.  Letting women vote has been a huge disaster, as the bulk of them tend to vote for left wing candidates and policies.  Women are different from men.  In general, women tend to be more emotional and nurturing.  This is good when it comes to raising children, but bad when it comes to making policies, as national policies cannot be based upon mercy and sympathy toward those who are threats, enemies, or just straight up drains on the economy.  It’s not the job of government to nurture, it’s the job of government to mediate disputes, provide order, and keep out invaders.  It costs money when government nurtures.

Women will see beggars lining up at the border, or citizens who don’t want to work, and say, “Oh those poor people, we should help them!”  Whereas men will think about the issue more in terms of costs and benefits.  Of course that is just a generalization.  There are women who know the score and can think about things rationally, and there are men who are badly cucked and/or are traitors.

Now I want to talk about the picture itself.  Even though it’s a cartoon, without having read the captions I would have no idea what they are trying to portray.  They are showing a crowd where the only shared characteristic is that everyone is female.  That is a group of people, but not a people group.  This is what the left wants, to have every country (or at least every 1st world country) filled with every kind of person that exists in equal numbers so that no particular people group is in charge (except for maybe banking elites).

If you want to have different cultures living together they need to be similar enough to where they have shared values and priorities.  If you want to have different races living together you need to have some other form of shared identity, like common principles and language.  The kind of hodgepodge the left wants to create has none of those things.  I can tell they aren’t interested in common values from the fact that they included a durka woman with a hijab in this picture.  Why not include a woman with a Nazi armband?  The Nazis were never as totalitarian as Islam.

They don’t want a shared language, values, or religion.  They want to have every single people group and religion sharing space, regardless of compatibility, and draconian laws in place to protect favored groups from hurt feelings.  It’s absurd.

They are making remarkable progress in turning the US into a region rather than a country.  What is an American these days?  Is it a particular ethnic group?  No.  Is it a religious group?  No.  Is it a particular culture?  No.  Is it a shared set of values and economic principles?  No.  It’s just a matter of being born in a particular territory, and no longer has any meaning when describing people, as it’s not affiliated with a particular group, culture, or set of values.  A category which lacks parameters describes nothing, and has no meaning.

I could say that liberals aren’t Americans, because they espouse an ideology which is antithetical to what the founders intended, but will other people accept that?  Some will, but most won’t.  I could say that the anchor babies born to illegals are not Americans, as they lack common origins with me in addition to shared values, and their presence in this country is was due to illegal entry/invasion, but both the government and public discourse will disagree with me.  So in the end, we have to qualify our group identity with things like “traditional American” (shared ideological and cultural identity), “European American” (common genetic inheritance), “conservative” (shared values and economic principles), “African American,” etc., but “American” by itself has come to mean nothing beyond citizenship.  “American” is no longer tied to any group identity, which is why we have to add qualifiers to it.


Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s