ISIS in Europe

So it would seem now, that ISIS terrorists are literally walking into Europe:

First of all, ISIS is Islam.  Even if there were any evidence for the claim that it was an improper interpretation of Islam, the fact is, without Islam ISIS, Hamas, Al Qaida, Hizballah, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Boko Haram would not exist.  Islam is the common thread in all those groups, and the base for them.

How did ISIS get started?  It started with Muslims.  The Koran is the basis for it.  I don’t understand why leftists are doing all sorts of soul searching to figure our why Muslims join ISIS and what they can do to stop it, or “prevent them from being radicalized.”

Here is what you can do, leftists, don’t let Muslims into your country.  It was probably reading the Koran and interpreting it literally that made them go and join ISIS.  Don’t let Muslims in, any one of them could decide to go on a shooting spree, blow himself up, or plant a bomb at any time.  Having them around is a security risk.  You have no way of predicting their behavior.  If you want to rule out Islamic terror then you have to rule out Islam.

The immigration policies are absolutely insane.  So because someone steps foot in western soil you can’t send them back?  Why not?  Why are they entitled to stay just because they step foot in your country?  If you hand over Europe to Muslims, then were are Europeans supposed to go?  Why should Europeans pay for Muslims or the citizens of other countries?

ISIS can literally walk into Europe and set up camp.  All they have to do is get on board a crappy ship, and the Swedish Navy will BRING them to Europe and let them loose.

People make jokes about 1940’s to 1960’s villains, and how transparent and openly evil they are, or how no one would be tricked by them, how they would be quickly undone because they boast openly about their plans, etc., but this is what ISIS is doing, and it’s working.  Emperor Ming has nothing on Islam.

So ISIS says they want to take Europe.  Leftist governments in Europe make token efforts to keep Muslims from leaving to join ISIS, but do nothing to stem to massive flow of Muslims going into Europe.  Apparently there are only two criterion for getting into Europe: 1) be a Muslim and 2) get on a boat.

That’s it, so of course ISIS is going to be there.  Also, even if the Muslims coming in are non-ISIS, all it takes is Muslims in order for ISIS to spring up.  Libya is not contiguous with ISIS territory in the Middle East, and yet, ISIS is there.  What do they have in common?  Islam.

Once ISIS is in Europe we can expect them to enslave our women and relentlessly destroy our historical artifacts and ancient sites.  They don’t even respect their own historical sites, so we can’t expect them to respect ours.

I really wish that all self hating Europeans would emigrate to the Middle East or Africa (since they seem to love those cultures so much and find them superior).  It’s one thing if they want to harm themselves, but I don’t appreciate how they want to put those of us who don’t share their feeling at risk, or how they are willing to expose our history to complete erasure.

Now, I would like to dwell a bit on how foolish this immigration policy is, and I will use some analogies in order to help the stupidity hit home:

Star Trek

This idiotic immigration policy would be like if the Federation decided that once a Borg drone got into Federation space they could claim asylum.  They don’t have to submit to having their implants removed, they don’t have to change their culture, and on top of that the Federation is going to provide them with free alcoves and a power source.

There would be no limit to how many Borg can come, and once they get across they will be escorted straight to Earth, Vulcan, Andor, Rigel, or wherever they want to go.  

The Borg wouldn’t even have to attack or force their way in, because they can just claim to be refugees and get free stuff while keeping all of their culture.

How long would the Federation last?  Not very long.

Lord of the Rings

This stupid immigration policy would be like if Gondor decided to let Orcs and Haradrim claim “refugee status.”  Imagine if the Orcs and Haradrim started showing up on the borders of Gondor and claiming that they were running away from Sauron.

If the Gondorians were as stupid and suicidal as governments in Europe, all that Sauron’s minions would have to do would be to show up at the doors and beg, and they would be let in where they could set up an internal base and wreak as much havoc as they want.

The current rulers in Europe are more insane, subversive, and destructive to their own people than Denethor was in LOTR.

Star Wars

This idiot immigration policy would be like if the Jedi let anyone and everyone join, including Sith.  It would be like if the Sith showed up at the Jedi academy, announced who they were, demanded to be taken in, fed, and accommodated, while brazenly announcing that they would keep their Sith ways.

What would happen if the Jedi let them in?  The Jedi would all be dead.

Now these analogies may seem absurd, but they are no more absurd than what the governments of Europe are doing.  Why are the governments of Europe doing this?  Because the left wing parties need more left wing voters.  Apparently there isn’t enough class hatred among white people to generate bloc voting for the left, so they have to bring in new classes.  The leftist politicians could not care less what kind of hell their policies inflict on Native Europeans, they just want to win votes at any cost.

Then we have the cuckservatives, who are so scared of the left that they compete with them to pander to hostile invaders for votes.  It’s insane, but here is the truth about democracy; everything except for direct democracy is rigged.  The politicians abuse whatever country they rule, milking it for what they can, and all their loyalty is to their sponsors and their party.  They will do whatever is best for themselves and their party.  They aren’t concerned with the country because it’s only a resource for them to milk, and people are only a means to that end.  Ironically, Democracy leads to less freedom and control over government rather than more.

Kings did a much better job ruling Europe, and they did not habitually facilitate invasions of their own countries.  If they did, then they would be executed.

That being said, I would like to give a heads up to the treasonous governments in Europe.  You may think you are bringing in hordes of new voters, and for the time being you are, but once they become the majority, or even 40% of the population, then you are severely jacked.  Those people are the most difficult to govern in the world.  The Middle Eastern dictators are under constant fear for their lives.  At best, their control over the Muslim countries is tenuous.  Saddam Hussein used to have multiple body doubles, and then after the US deposed him his people wasted no time in wrecking his statues, palaces, images, etc.  In other places Muslims riot and terrorize their own government, so that their dictator has to live in constant fear of assassination.

So have fun with your Muslim country, but in the end you’re going to pay a heavy price.  You’ll need body doubles and heavy, perpetual, security, and you will be dealing with constant terrorism and riots.  If you allow any kind of vote then people will vote for whoever is the most Islamic, which won’t be you if you’re a European atheist or agnostic.

Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s