Do Not Be Cuckolded by Islam

While on Twitter, I came across a heated debate between Katie McHugh and Mike Armstrong.  It was over whether or not the so-called “Muslim Refugees” should be allowed into Europe.

Cucking for Islam

I don’t know what the mental disease is that causes people to admire Islam, or to view them as allies.  Muhammad said very specifically not to take Christians and Jews as friends:

O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

–Quran 5:51

Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world.

–Quran 53:29

Now I’ll admit, when I was in my teens I also thought that Islam might be an ally.  Why?  Well I was irritated with the moral and social decay I saw around me, and that was back in the 90’s, things are much worse now.  I was just starting to learn about Islam at the time, and when I heard that Muslims were opposed to homosexuality, abortion, and (ostensibly) sex outside of marriage, I thought I found some friends who shared my values, or at least my grievances.

However, as I learned more about them, I discovered that they are not an ally, and there are far more differences than similarities.  Yes, Muslims do keep their women under control, but they do it by beating and killing them, sometimes by disfiguring them.  They still practice stoning, and they think it is acceptable to kill people for talking negatively about their religion or their “prophet” (Muhammad).  They have a fanatical Hitleresque style hatred for the Jews, and will not even denounce Hamas for their methods, simply because Hamas is hitting a target that they don’t like.  So with Islam, the ends totally justify the means.

Muslims don’t oppose abortion because they objectively value life.  They literally think it’s OK to kill their own children for having wrong/different beliefs.  They oppose abortion because they believe in having lots of kids.

They are not an ally.  You can see how they view Christians by looking at ISIS, or if anyone thinks that is too “extreme” there is also “moderate” Egypt, where Christians have been whittled down to 10% through years of persecution, murder, and forced conversion.

Muslims don’t believe in secular government. They have no concept of separation of Mosque and state. They believe in furthering the cause of Islam. In moderate Egypt, ALL school children are forced to memorize and recite Koran verses.  Christians and atheists are not allowed to form their own separate private schools.

Everything they do is geared toward furthering the cause of Islam.  As for converting Muslims to Christianity, by any means necessary, whether it be force, guile, debate, or high birthrates.  Now, I have no problem with debates, but debate and logical persuasion is the only acceptable venue for spreading a belief system or ideology. Force doesn’t actually win an argument, the most force can do is shut an argument down.  Also, unless you are stupid, there isn’t really a concrete case for Islam.  Islam is entirely predicated on the credibility of Muhammad, and that credibility is vouched for entirely by the man himself.  The arguments are inherently circular.

Your have a much better chance of converting the most stubborn, fedora toting internet atheist than the average Muslim.  Yes, there is lack of logic behind Islam, but Muslims live largely in the realm of non-logic when it comes to Islam.  As soon as you start saying something they can’t digest, no matter how peacefully and rationally you state it, they will shut down. Muhammad already told them that you are a liar and deceiver, that the Bible is corrupt (and any point where it contradicts Islam is evidence of said corruption), and on top of that Islam carries a death penalty for apostasy.  So you literally cannot reason with the bulk of Muslims, and in any case they aren’t interested in logic and reason.

Trying to engage a Muslim in the realm of facts and logic is like trying to explain why democracy, feminism, and multiculturalism are bad to a liberal.  They can’t hear your logic and reason over the sound of sirens going off in their head because you stepped on their feelz.  It’s the same thing here.

People used to say, “Never forget 9/11,” but I say, “Never forget Constantinople.”  Of course, today it’s called “Istanbul,” but that’s not it’s real name.  Constantinople was all that was left of Roman civilization, the very source of western civilization.  Muslims took it because their religion told them to, in fact, it was one of the imperatives that Muhammad gave them.

Panoramik-Mueze-2-1 Benjamin-Constant-The_Entry_of_Mahomet_II_into_Constantinople-1876

Once they took Constantinople, they immediately set to raping and destroying, burning our libraries, desecrating our churches, raping our women, and selling our women and children into slavery.  They didn’t enrich or improve a single thing, and the loss to western civilization is incalculable.  If there was a cure for cancer there we will never know, and there might have been.  They had working animatronics in Constantinople 1000 years before the industrial revolution, they could have been equally advanced in other ways as well.

sack of Constantinople

Regarding the robots:

How can we just let it slide that the remnant of our original civilization was destroyed by Islam?  That was one of our greatest (if not the greatest) repositories of our history and science, going all the way back to Rome.  What did Islam give us in exchange for that?  Nothing.

Today Islam works very much like a cuckoo bird.  In the past Muslims used to just force their way into infidel countries, but as they are unable to keep up with the technological advances of infidels, they have to come by means other than direct force.  Fortunately for them, western governments are so stupid that they are just able to literally walk in and stay.  Like the cuckoo, Muslims come in and receive food and benefits from other peoples, while contributing nothing.  This is at the expense of resources which we might otherwise spend on our own people and children.  It’s a drain.

Muslims reproduce at a higher rate than host population, and at the expense of the host population, and when they become numerous enough they dispossess the host population.

So we have established that Muslims are not an ally, and have little to nothing in common with us, but are they refugees?  Are they really fleeing from anything?

The answer is no.  Islam created the miserable conditions that exist in their homelands.  If they were really trying to get away from it they would leave Islam behind when they come here, but they don’t do that.  If they did then we would not be seeing one single hijab in the west, and certainly no burkas.  They bring their culture with them, and once they have numbers they start advocating for special privileges, and they form groups like CAIR.

So unless you want to be enriched to death, you must keep Islam out.  If some of them really are refugees then make them renounce their faith before coming in, or offer to adopt their little kids for them.  Their kids would then be raised in Christian, Jewish, or atheist homes, so we would still be providing for their kids, but it would be done without breeding terror in our midst.

Saying things like “white men also rape” is not a valid reason for letting Muslims in.  Every culture has rapists, but some have a lot more than others, and some are conducive to rape.  We can’t help that there are rapists already here, but we can keep more from coming in.  Is rape more tolerable if it’s committed by someone from an alien culture?  No, in fact it’s less tolerable because that person doesn’t have to be here.

Why not put your own people first, and if you can’t do that at least think about yourself?

I will conclude with two parables:


There once was a wolf who went down to the side of a river to cross it.  Near the edge of the river he found a snake.  The snake wanted to get to the other side of the river, so he asked the wolf to take him across the river on his back.

The wolf said, “If I do that then you could bite me.”

“No I won’t,” the snake said, “I need to get across just as badly as you do.”

The wolf thought that sounded reasonable, and he took pity on the snake.  He let the snake slither up onto his back and swam out into the river.  But when he was halfway across the river the snake bit him.

“Why did you do that?” the wolf asked, “Now we are both going to die.”

“It’s my nature,” the snake replied, “You should have known.”


A farmer went out into his fields during a rainstorm to inspect his crops.  It was a cold rain, and as he made his way through it he found a snake lying in the mud, barely moving.

He took pity on the snake, which seemed to be freezing to death.

“I’m doing well, I’ve got a warm house and a fire,” he said, “I can afford to help this creature and show it some kindness.”

The farmer took the snake into his house and warmed the snake by the fire.  When the snake recovered he immediately bit the farmer.  The snake did not care that the farmer showed him kindness, he only knew how to act in accordance with his nature.



Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s