Some Truths: Communism and Cultural Marxism


No matter how urgent the threat of hostile alien cultures or Islam is, we must never forget about Communism, a creeping evil which can, and does, seep into any culture.  No matter what race or culture communism infects, it’s going to produce an unfree, technologically moribund, backwards, starving, hellhole of a country.  Communism is the reason why North Korea is a backwards, starving, goolag, while South Korea is a modern technological paradise.  Before the Korean split, there was absolutely zero cultural and genetic difference between north and south.  In fact, the north had all of the industrial development, but today it is the south.  What changed?  Communism.

I am a big reader of sci-fi and fantasy, although I prefer older authors over contemporary.  One of my favorite authors is Edger Rice Burroughs, who consistently uses communists as the enemy, no matter which planet the protagonist is on.  Whether it’s Venus, the Moon, or that world from “Beyond the Farthest Star,” his depiction of communism is always the same, and it’s dead on.  The communists are depicted as people who have low IQ, are lacking in morals, and are often physically unattractive.  Regardless of race, this is how the communists are, and regardless of what they were prior to communism, the country (or planet) will become a hellhole.  Whether it’s Europeans (USSR), Asians (North Korea), or Amerindians (Venezuela), the country is going to be wrecked.  There will be food shortages, and little to no technological progress.  There will also be no freedom of speech, religion, or association.  Instead of having your choice of everything at a reduced price, you are at the mercy of whatever rations happen to be available, and what your government mandated allotment is.

“In Soviet Russia, store shops for you!”

Most of the people who advocate communism are low-achieving, beta (or gamma), losers.  I don’t say this to denigrate them or sling mud, only to report what I have encountered.  They typically have not been very successful, don’t have a job (or a well paying one), and often lack female companionship.  I believe this makes them bitter, and so they come to perceive themselves as victims, and turn to an ideology which calls for taking the things they covet by force rather than earning them.

Communists have no respect for voluntary association.  What they want is a one-world communist government.  Some claim to be anti-statists, but when challenged on how they will achieve world-wide socialism without force they either have nothing to say, or admit that they are willing to use force to boost other people’s stuff.

The worst thing about communism (and all left wing agendas), is that there is no opting out.  They are never content to sit in their own corner and do their own thing.  They have no concept of NAP or “live and let live.”  They believe that their ideas and models are universal, and that if people don’t buy into it then they must be hammered into it.  But why?

Based on what I have seen, the communist is like a miserable child, who wants other people to be miserable because he’s miserable.  It’s common for children to think in this fashion, as they do not yet have the cognitive development to prevent their intellect from being subsumed by their emotions.  Most of us could probably remember a time when we were miserable over something, as a child, and upon seeing other children happy we felt a gut level urge to destroy their happiness.  The average communist never grew out of that state of mind.


In a far right society (and there is nothing further right than ancap), the communist is still free to do whatever he wants.  He can buy land, and establish a commune where all the hippies can congregate and share everything/own nothing.  The only thing a communist cannot do in a far-right society is ruin other people’s happiness.  However, in a communist society, an individual who wants to own his own things cannot.  The communist won’t be content with having an autonomous commune surrounded by free and successful people, because the success of those people, who have achieved what he cannot, will gall him and chafe at him.

A communist who wants a socialist US will not get up and go to Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Sweden, or whatever, because that won’t destroy the happiness of people living in America.  We are willing to let them go, but they want to chase us down.

There is only so much utility and insight that can be gleaned from psychoanalyzing (or attempting to) the communist.  I just want everyone to beware.


Nothing exists which is not real.  If equality is something that has to be created, then it does not exist.  The only people who are equal are identical twins (or triplets, etc.) at birth, and that is only because they are genetic copies of one another and have no life experience to differentiate them.  People are not equal at the individual level in most cases.  People vary in IQ, strength, talent, and ability.  If people were equal then we would all have the same body, IQ, abilities, talent, and be the same age.  Obviously this is impossible, so there is no basis for supposing or presupposing equality.

A man with an IQ of 70 is not the intellectual equal of a man with an IQ of 160.  The former has less than half the intelligence of the latter.  Performing brain surgery is a much more difficult task than pushing a basket at a grocery store, which is why doctors get paid so much more than courtesy clerks or retail associates.  Almost anyone can push a basket and carry groceries, but very few people can perform brain surgery.  If we lived in a universe were mental tasks were easy and physical tasks were hard then a basket pusher might get paid more than a brain surgeon, but we don’t.  Yes, all (or most) tasks do have value, but not the same value, because supply and demand are factors.

Economic Disparities:

Socioeconomic stratification is a natural outgrowth of specialization of labor, which is a requisite for civilization.  The only type of culture which has everyone sharing all resources and earning the same/nothing/subsistence, is tribal culture where the only specialization of labor is male vs. female tasks.  The culture is technologically moribund, minimalist, stagnate, and achieves nothing other than bare subsistence.  Everyone is equal in terms of social and economic outcomes, but there is no progress, and whatever potential for progress and innovation their might be, however minimal, is not being utilized.

Specialization of labor allows people to devote their time to what they are good at, and/or enjoy, and while it is true that some people will earn more than others in this setting, the quality of life is uplifted for most people.  Even the people stuck working low income jobs still get to have things like air-conditioning, running water, TV, and radio, vs. tribal societies where people lie on the ground and eat insects while other insects eat them.

Socialism Vs. Tradition:

When defending socialism, leftists will say something along the lines of; “What about poor people and old people?”

In traditional societies people get married, produce children, and take care of the children they produce.  Then, when the parents get old, the children take care of the parents.  If a family member is struggling the other family members help out.  For those who don’t have families there are/were religious organizations to help and assist when they are down and out.

In India, for example, parents often move in with one of their children after retirement, or in some cases one or more of the children never moves out.

It makes sense for family members to support one another, as they are building strength, but it does not make sense for one to be expected or forced to take care of people with whom he has no relation, connection, or vested interest.

Socialists often refuse to form proper families and work, but then they expect other people to be held responsible for them in their old age, or (in the event that they do have children) to be held responsible for their children.  Really I would prefer to keep my money and invest it in my own children, who I have a natural and immediate connection to, than complete strangers who don’t even share my values and might not even be from the same country.

When arguing these matters with a socialist, the leftist may then attempt to appeal to your religion (real or presumed) and argue how you should want to give because Jesus called for it.  It is true that Jesus called for giving, but he also said to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  In any case there is a difference between voluntary giving and boosting another person’s stuff.  I would tell the leftist that if they want to appeal to Christianity, the logical course of action is to go to a church and ask for help.

Out of one corner of his mouth the socialist begs and demands a safety net, while out of the other he condemns and works to undermine all the natural/traditional safety nets, such as family and religion.

Feminism & MGTOW:

Both feminism and MGTOW are predicated upon hatred and dismissal of the other sex.  They are two sides of the same coin.  It could be argued that MGTOW is a reaction to feminism, but it is not a solution to it.  MGTOW does not have the ability to overwhelm or subsume feminism.  It is like a little boy taking his ball and going home after the other little boys told him that they don’t want to play with him or his ball, or a teenage boy telling a girl he will never talk to her again after she tells him she never wants to talk to him again.

Hating the other sex is not productive, and will ultimately lead to population extinction.  In traditional societies/the natural way, men and women are not rivals, but partners.  Men and women are different, and have different functions, but are meant to work together.

One of the most insidious things the left has done to western civilization is the fostering enmity between men and women, and forcing them to compete in the same sphere for the same functions.  When women do not perform the traditionally male task of bread-winning as well as men, the left blames it on the inherent prejudice of men rather than recognizing that there are inherent differences between men and women.

The left has told women that the only task which has value is earning money and having a career, which is the traditional male function.  In the event that a woman cannot garner a successful career, then the government is there to provide her with financial support and security.  In the first case women are isolated, and in the second they are married to government, but in both cases women have been divorced from men.

Regardless of sex, having a career is only a means to an end (survival), not the end itself.  A career without children is not an investment in the future.

Coming back to the solution to feminism, there is no easy answer.  Women, in general, are followers rather than leaders, so their views and opinions can be changed through logic (yes, they are capable of understanding logic) combined with a strong personality.  If you lack the logic and force of personality to alter a woman’s views, or if the woman is too tainted (had sex with many partners) for it to be worth while, then there is the option of bringing in women from other cultures where feminism and cultural Marxism do not have the same level of influence.  I recommend Eastern Europe, Russia, India, and China.

MGTOW is self defeating and nihilistic.  It amounts to ending feminism by ending humanity, or at least cultures where feminism exists.  But if an entire culture or race is destroyed in order to destroy feminism then that is still a failure of colossal magnitude.

Liberalism vs. Western Civilization:

There are many people who conflate liberalism with western civilization, and will talk about the promulgation of sexual immorality in non-western cultures as being an artifact of western civilization, or “westernization.”  This theory is thoroughly incorrect.

Traditional western civilization was hierarchical, patriarchal, and family oriented, with high birth rates, and in some cases arranged marriages.  The flow of power ran from King to man, to husband, to wife, to children.  Most people knew their place, and had a place, unlike today where so many people are shiftless, purposeless, confused, and unfulfilled.

Liberalism opposes, at every turn, our traditional culture and values, and seeks to guard against it’s reemergence.  Liberalism is only western civilization as much as the AIDS virus is the body it infects.  The AIDS is not the person, the person does not need the AIDS, and the virus does nothing to help the person it infects.  Ultimately the AIDS virus is going to shorten the lifespan of the person it infects, as well as reduce the quality of their life, and that is what liberalism does to any civilization it touches.


Published by:


I could be described as a libertarian monarchist with religious leanings and sympathies towards anarchy and nationalism. I have realized that a lot of my views are reactionary. Most of the time it's when I see something I don't like that I feel inspired to write. I'm basically like a badger being poked with a stick. I'm fairly ornery when poked, but I don't wish people harm provided that they don't seek to harm me either directly or indirectly. I don't at all care for the left, and I am not at all happy that they are out to destroy my way of life and undermine my freedom. But one of my goals is to spread awareness as much as I can. My Manifesto in Short.: 1. Dejure rights and positive liberty are invalid concepts. Man in his natural state is free. He is free to create what he wants, occupy and defend a territory he exists in, associate with who he wants, wear what he wants, say what he wants, follow whatever religion he wants, and essentially do whatever he pleases. Government is an artificial imposition which requires force both to come into existence and to exist. Therefore, government is not in a position to grant freedom or rights, as those already exist prior to the institution of government. Government can curtail freedoms, but it can never give them. The only fully legitimate function of government is to protect the natural rights of others from being violated by forces which they are incapable of combating, for example, protecting a farmer from the Mongol invasion. Protecting someone from having their feelings hurt is not a legitimate function, as never having hurt feelings is not a natural right. 2. Freedom of association and speech are more important than anyone's feelings. Feelings are subjective, and there is no reason why one person's feelings are any more valid than anyone else's. A law to protect one person's feelings from being hurt is certain to harm another person's, therefore, feelings cannot be a basis for law. My freedoms do not end where another person's feelings begin. 3. Democracy is a failure, and it is predicated on faulty premises. In order for Democracy to work, two criterion must be fulfilled, 1) those who tally the votes must do so honestly, and 2) those who vote must be moral and intelligent enough to make wise and proper decisions. The first premise is impossible to prove, and the second is not true of most people, therefore, Democracy is a questionable endeavor at best, and ultimately doomed to failure. In fact, under the best of circumstances Democracy is mob rule, but aside from that it also opens the door to demagoguery, tribal politics, and lobbying. 4. Communism and Islam are no less evil than Nazism. Communism has killed more people than Nazism, and in fact Stalin alone killed more people than Hitler. Islam has killed, and continues to kill more people than Communism and Nazism together. The only reason why communism and Islam are given a free pass is because Cultural Marxists are in charge of education, the media, and entertainment. Cultural Marxists have decided to institute communism by attacking the culture, and they have recognized Islam as something which they can use as an ally (for the time being). That is why both of those toxic ideologies get a free pass, but really they should not. Hitler worked with both Communists AND Muslims before the allies entered the war, and during the war he continued to work with Muslims. If some guy were to go around in a Nazi uniform and goose-step and Sieg hiel as he walked down the street he would never be able to get a job. His life would be over, and he might even be met with physical violence. If a white guy did it then things would be even worse. However, Muslims are able to walk down our streets wearing their terrorist clothing, their robes and hijabs, which represent thousands of years of slaughter, antisemitism, and persecution of religious and ethnic minorities (not to mention violence against women), and people just let them go. I want a complete and indefinite hiatus on Muslim immigration, and I want us to start repatriating the Muslims that are already here. 5. I utterly reject the concept of the "social contract." I did not ask to exist, nor did I have any control over what part of the world I was born in, which people group I was born into, or what other groups might happen to exist around me. Since my existence is entirely involuntary, I cannot be held responsible for the fact that I exist, nor is my existence sufficient grounds to argue that I owe something to someone else. I do not owe anyone money, goods, or services simply on the basis that I exist or that they exist. 6. Collective guild is a rubbish concept. No one can help what group they are born into, and no one is born owing anyone else anything. Debt is the result of borrowing resources on some level, and having just entered in the world one does not have the capacity to borrow, or really do anything beyond the most basic biological functions. Therefore, the notion that one baby is born owing something to another baby is absurd at best. 7. I thoroughly support Israel. I fully admit to supporting Israel for religious reasons, but if those were not in place I would still support Israel out of enlightened self-interest. Israel fulfills the real world equivalent of the function Gondor serves in Tolkien's Middle Earth. By that I mean they are close to the evil army, and draw a lot of it's attention and focus, and in doing so they protect the west. The difference is, that in Tolkien's world the west does not actively seek to import orcs and other members of the evil army, behind Gondor's back, whereas our moron leaders in real life do constantly import the evil army. Also, Jews are not a monolithic group, There are both left wing and right wing Jews. Those who are on the left are not motivated by religion to do what they do, but by the perverse Marxist ideology which they have adopted in place of their religion.

Categories UncategorizedTags , , , , , , 2 Comments

2 thoughts on “Some Truths: Communism and Cultural Marxism”

  1. Great post – I agree with everything you say here. What I just don’t get is why would a woman want a man that wants a handout… they don’t, so how do you convince the men that Marxism is not the way to go, that you make the world a better place by contributing something beautiful and useful, by creating something that others want? As far as the women go – stop cleaning up their mess and taking responsibility for their mistakes and they will change. Take away the welfare and no more single mothers. Take away government housing and no more unproductive parents having more children… take away all hand-outs and and it’s a matter of weeks before the US returns to being prosperous and great again… but the system is rigged, there is no need for government if there are no people that relay on the things government hands out.


    1. I agree that we should terminate all the handouts, especially to people who are capable of working. Of course, when that happens there are going to be mass riots, but if the cops are free to respond with any level of force necessary, then the problem will be quickly corrected.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s